mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving Performance in Reinforcement Learning by Breaking Generalization in Neural Networks

arXiv 2003.07417 ↗First posted 16 Mar 2020cs.LG cs.AI cs.NEcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning systems require good representations to work well. For decades practical success in reinforcement learning was limited to small domains. Deep reinforcement learning systems, on the other hand, are scalable, not dependent on domain specific prior knowledge and have been successfully used to play Atari, in 3D navigation from pixels, and to control high degree of freedom robots. Unfortunately, the performance of deep reinforcement learning systems is sensitive to hyper-parameter settings and architecture choices. Even well tuned systems exhibit significant instability both within a trial and across experiment replications. In practice, significant expertise and trial and error are usually required to achieve good performance. One potential source of the problem is known as catastrophic interference: when later training decreases performance by overriding previous learning. Interestingly, the powerful generalization that makes Neural Networks (NN) so effective in batch supervised learning might explain the challenges when applying them in reinforcement learning tasks. In this paper, we explore how online NN training and interference interact in reinforcement learning. We find that simply re-mapping the input observations to a high-dimensional space improves learning speed and parameter sensitivity. We also show this preprocessing reduces interference in prediction tasks. More practically, we provide a simple approach to NN training that is easy to implement, and requires little additional computation. We demonstrate that our approach improves performance in both prediction and control with an extensive batch of experiments in classic control domains.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 6; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 3.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Streaming Deep Reinforcement Learning Finally Workscited by 24
  2. 2023Behavior Alignment via Reward Function Optimizationcited by 16
  3. 2024Improving Deep Reinforcement Learning by Reducing the Chain Effect of Value and Policy Churncited by 16
  4. 2021Catastrophic Interference in Reinforcement Learning: A Solution Based on Context Division and Knowledge Distillationcited by 15
  5. 2022Reinforcement Learning with Automated Auxiliary Loss Searchcited by 12
  6. 2022Learning Dynamics and Generalization in Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
  7. 2023Elephant Neural Networks: Born to Be a Continual Learnercited by 10
  8. 2023Harnessing Discrete Representations For Continual Reinforcement Learningcited by 10
  9. 2022Memory-efficient Reinforcement Learning with Value-based Knowledge Consolidationcited by 9
  10. 2021Does the Adam Optimizer Exacerbate Catastrophic Forgetting?cited by 5
  11. 2024Frequency and Generalisation of Periodic Activation Functions in Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
  12. 2025LiBOG: Lifelong Learning for Black-Box Optimizer Generationcited by 3
5 more
  1. 2025Is Exploration or Optimization the Problem for Deep Reinforcement Learning?cited by 1
  2. 2022Improving generalization to new environments and removing catastrophic forgetting in Reinforcement Learning by using an eco-system of agentscited by 0
  3. 2022Generalization Through the Lens of Learning Dynamicscited by 0
  4. 2022Improving generalization in reinforcement learning through forked agentscited by 0
  5. 2025Efficient Reinforcement Learning by Reducing Forgetting with Elephant Activation Functionscited by 0