mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Can Increasing Input Dimensionality Improve Deep Reinforcement Learning?

arXiv 2003.01629 ↗First posted 3 Mar 2020cs.LG cs.RO stat.MLcited by 37

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms have recently achieved remarkable successes in various sequential decision making tasks, leveraging advances in methods for training large deep networks. However, these methods usually require large amounts of training data, which is often a big problem for real-world applications. One natural question to ask is whether learning good representations for states and using larger networks helps in learning better policies. In this paper, we try to study if increasing input dimensionality helps improve performance and sample efficiency of model-free deep RL algorithms. To do so, we propose an online feature extractor network (OFENet) that uses neural nets to produce good representations to be used as inputs to deep RL algorithms. Even though the high dimensionality of input is usually supposed to make learning of RL agents more difficult, we show that the RL agents in fact learn more efficiently with the high-dimensional representation than with the lower-dimensional state observations. We believe that stronger feature propagation together with larger networks (and thus larger search space) allows RL agents to learn more complex functions of states and thus improves the sample efficiency. Through numerical experiments, we show that the proposed method outperforms several other state-of-the-art algorithms in terms of both sample efficiency and performance. Codes for the proposed method are available at http://www.merl.com/research/license/OFENet .

Key facts. Cited by 37 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 9; 2024: 5; 2025: 10; 2026: 8.

37 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Randomized Ensembled Double Q-Learning: Learning Fast Without a Modelcited by 278
  2. 2023For SALE: State-Action Representation Learning for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 73
  3. 2024Bridging State and History Representations: Understanding Self-Predictive RLcited by 52
  4. 2023A Survey on Transformers in Reinforcement Learningcited by 50
  5. 2021Training Larger Networks for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 37
  6. 2025Hyperspherical Normalization for Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
  7. 2024LLM-Empowered State Representation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 28
  8. 2024Cross-Domain Policy Adaptation by Capturing Representation Mismatchcited by 24
  9. 2024Improving Deep Reinforcement Learning by Reducing the Chain Effect of Value and Policy Churncited by 16
  10. 2022Reinforcement Learning with Automated Auxiliary Loss Searchcited by 12
  11. 2023Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning in Mixed Systems through Augmented Samples and Its Applications to Queueing Networkscited by 9
  12. 2023Mind the Model, Not the Agent: The Primacy Bias in Model-based RLcited by 9
25 more
  1. 2025MOBODY: Model Based Off-Dynamics Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
  2. 2022Transformer in Transformer as Backbone for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
  3. 2023State Sequences Prediction via Fourier Transform for Representation Learningcited by 6
  4. 2024Student-Informed Teacher Trainingcited by 6
  5. 2023PDiT: Interleaving Perception and Decision-making Transformers for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
  6. 2025Safety Representations for Safer Policy Learningcited by 4
  7. 2023A Scalable Network-Aware Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Framework for Decentralized Inverter-based Voltage Controlcited by 2
  8. 2026Temporal Difference Learning with Constrained Initial Representationscited by 2
  9. 2021DASHA: Decentralized Autofocusing System with Hierarchical Agentscited by 1
  10. 2023Improving Reinforcement Learning Efficiency with Auxiliary Tasks in Non-Visual Environments: A Comparisoncited by 1
  11. 2025Quantifying First-Order Markov Violations in Noisy Reinforcement Learning: A Causal Discovery Approachcited by 1
  12. 2025Exploring the robustness of TractOracle methods in RL-based tractographycited by 1
  13. 2025Is Exploration or Optimization the Problem for Deep Reinforcement Learning?cited by 1
  14. 2026Debiased Model-based Representations for Sample-efficient Continuous Controlcited by 1
  15. 2023Intelligent DRL-Based Adaptive Region of Interest for Delay-sensitive Telemedicine Applicationscited by 0
  16. 2025LiLaN: A Linear Latent Network as the Solution Operator for Real-Time Solutions to Stiff Nonlinear Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 0
  17. 2025Online Training and Pruning of Deep Reinforcement Learning Networkscited by 0
  18. 2025Scaling DRL for Decision Making: A Survey on Data, Network, and Training Budget Strategiescited by 0
  19. 2025Learning Safe Autonomous Driving Policies Using Predictive Safety Representationscited by 0
  20. 2026Multi-Agent Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Joint State-Action Learned Embeddingscited by 0
  21. 2026Integrating Causal DAGs in Deep RL: Activating Minimal Markovian States with Multi-Order Exposurecited by 0
  22. 2026NASDAQ: Normalized Observation Space Dynamics-Augmented Q-Learningcited by 0
  23. 2026Compositional Behavioral Semantics for State Abstraction in Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  24. 2026Observation-Grounded Self-Predictive Reinforcement Learning for Visual Continuous Controlcited by 0
  25. 2026ProDVI: Programmatic Dynamics Priors for Value Network Initializationcited by 0