mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Rank and Gradient Lost in Non-stationarity: Sample Weight Decay for Mitigating Plasticity Loss in Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2604.01913 ↗First posted 2 Apr 2026cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep reinforcement learning (RL) suffers from plasticity loss severely due to the nature of non-stationarity, which impairs the ability to adapt to new data and learn continually. Unfortunately, our understanding of how plasticity loss arises, dissipates, and can be dissolved remains limited to empirical findings, leaving the theoretical end underexplored.To address this gap, we study the plasticity loss problem from the theoretical perspective of network optimization. By formally characterizing the two culprit factors in online RL process: the non-stationarity of data distributions and the non-stationarity of targets induced by bootstrapping, our theory attributes the loss of plasticity to two mechanisms: the rank collapse of the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) Gram matrix and the Theta(frac1k) decay of gradient magnitude. The first mechanism echoes prior empirical findings from the theoretical perspective and sheds light on the effects of existing methods, e.g., network reset, neuron recycle, and noise injection. Against this backdrop, we focus primarily on the second mechanism and aim to alleviate plasticity loss by addressing the gradient attenuation issue, which is orthogonal to existing methods. We propose Sample Weight Decay -- a lightweight method to restore gradient magnitude, as a general remedy to plasticity loss for deep RL methods based on experience replay. In experiments, we evaluate the efficacy of methodName upon TD3, myaddedDouble DQN and SAC with SimBa architecture in MuJoCo, myaddedALE and DeepMind Control Suite tasks. The results demonstrate that methodName effectively alleviates plasticity loss and consistently improves learning performance across various configurations of deep RL algorithms, UTD, network architectures, and environments, achieving SOTA performance on challenging DMC Humanoid tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2026.

Builds on

29 of 36 references.

References · 29

  1. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  2. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  3. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  4. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
  5. 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,179
  6. 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
  7. 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,070
  8. 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
  9. 2018A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterizationcited by 784
  10. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 781
  11. 2019Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Handcited by 699
  12. 2022The Primacy Bias in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 242
17 more
  1. 2023The Dormant Neuron Phenomenon in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 171
  2. 2023Deep Reinforcement Learning with Plasticity Injectioncited by 71
  3. 2024SimBa: Simplicity Bias for Scaling Up Parameters in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 70
  4. 2024Addressing Loss of Plasticity and Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual Learningcited by 49
  5. 2024In value-based deep reinforcement learning, a pruned network is a good networkcited by 38
  6. 2023Continual Learning as Computationally Constrained Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
  7. 2023Small batch deep reinforcement learningcited by 35
  8. 2024No Representation, No Trust: Connecting Representation, Collapse, and Trust Issues in PPOcited by 27
  9. 2023Resetting the Optimizer in Deep RL: An Empirical Studycited by 26
  10. 2023Directions of Curvature as an Explanation for Loss of Plasticitycited by 26
  11. 2024Parseval Regularization for Continual Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
  12. 2024Improving Deep Reinforcement Learning by Reducing the Chain Effect of Value and Policy Churncited by 16
  13. 2025Measure gradients, not activations! Enhancing neuronal activity in deep reinforcement learningcited by 14
  14. 2024Adam on Local Time: Addressing Nonstationarity in RL with Relative Adam Timestepscited by 11
  15. 2025A Forget-and-Grow Strategy for Deep Reinforcement Learning Scaling in Continuous Controlcited by 9
  16. 2023Reset It and Forget It: Relearning Last-Layer Weights Improves Continual and Transfer Learningcited by 6
  17. 2020Exit Time Analysis for Approximations of Gradient Descent Trajectories Around Saddle Pointscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.