Approximate Next Policy Sampling: Replacing Conservative Target Policy Updates in Deep RL
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity
Abstract (arXiv)
We revisit a classic "chicken-and-egg" problem in reinforcement learning: to safely improve a policy, the value function must be accurate on the state-visitation distribution of the updated policy. That distribution over states is unknown and cannot be sampled for the purposes of training the value function. Conservative updates solve this problem, but at the cost of shrinking the policy update. This paper explores an alternative solution, Approximate Next Policy Sampling (ANPS), which addresses the problem by modifying the training distribution rather than constraining the policy update. ANPS is satisfied if the distribution of the training data approximates that of the next policy. To demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of ANPS, we introduce Stable Value Approximate Policy Iteration (SV-API). SV-API modifies the standard approximate policy iteration loop to hold the target policy fixed while an iteratively updated behavioral policy gathers relevant experience. It only commits to a new policy once a convergence criterion has been met. If certain stability criteria are met, the update is guaranteed to be safe; otherwise, it remains no less safe than standard approximate policy iteration. Applying SV-API to PPO yields Stable Value PPO (SV-PPO), which matches or improves performance on high-dimensional discrete (Atari) and continuous control benchmarks while executing substantially larger target policy updates. These results demonstrate the viability of ANPS as a new solution to this classic challenge in RL.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 14 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.
Builds on
14 of 26 references.
References · 14
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 2,026
- 2018IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architecturescited by 883
- 2021Brax -- A Differentiable Physics Engine for Large Scale Rigid Body Simulationcited by 407
- 2018Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimisationcited by 328
- 2016Safe and Efficient Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 264
- 2022Discovered Policy Optimisationcited by 104
- 2024Simplifying Deep Temporal Difference Learningcited by 78
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Deterministic Policy Gradient for Reinforcement Learning with Continuous Time and State
- 2025Improving Value Estimation Critically Enhances Vanilla Policy Gradient
- 2025Stabilizing Reinforcement Learning with LLMs: Formulation and Practices
- 2026Multi-Step Likelihood-Ratio Correction for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards
- 2026Trust the Batch, On- or Off-Policy: Adaptive Policy Optimization for RL Post-Training
- 2026Learning from the Near Future: Temporal Self-Distillation for RLVR
- 2024The Definitive Guide to Policy Gradients in Deep Reinforcement Learning: Theory, Algorithms and Implementations
- 2026Enabling Token-wise Importance Sampling in Off-Policy RLVR with Proximal KL Regularization