mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Seizing Serendipity: Exploiting the Value of Past Success in Off-Policy Actor-Critic

arXiv 2306.02865 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning high-quality Q-value functions plays a key role in the success of many modern off-policy deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms. Previous works primarily focus on addressing the value overestimation issue, an outcome of adopting function approximators and off-policy learning. Deviating from the common viewpoint, we observe that Q-values are often underestimated in the latter stage of the RL training process, potentially hindering policy learning and reducing sample efficiency. We find that such a long-neglected phenomenon is often related to the use of inferior actions from the current policy in Bellman updates as compared to the more optimal action samples in the replay buffer. To address this issue, our insight is to incorporate sufficient exploitation of past successes while maintaining exploration optimism. We propose the Blended Exploitation and Exploration (BEE) operator, a simple yet effective approach that updates Q-value using both historical best-performing actions and the current policy. Based on BEE, the resulting practical algorithm BAC outperforms state-of-the-art methods in over 50 continuous control tasks and achieves strong performance in failure-prone scenarios and real-world robot tasks. Benchmark results and videos are available at https://jity16.github.io/BEE/.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 85 of its 138 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2023.

Builds on

85 of 138 references.

References · 85

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  4. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
  5. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
  6. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,258
  7. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,809
  8. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,736
  9. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,293
  10. 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,241
  11. 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,240
  12. 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,204
38 more
  1. 2018Exploration by Random Network Distillationcited by 993
  2. 2021A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 899
  3. 2019Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reductioncited by 840
  4. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 807
  5. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Handful of Trials using Probabilistic Dynamics Modelscited by 774
  6. 2019When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 773
  7. 2017Learning Complex Dexterous Manipulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning and Demonstrationscited by 715
  8. 2020AWAC: Accelerating Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datasetscited by 671
  9. 2019Learning agile and dynamic motor skills for legged robotscited by 504
  10. 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 503
  11. 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 487
  12. 2020Reinforcement Learning with Augmented Datacited by 468
  13. 2022Temporal Difference Learning for Model Predictive Controlcited by 397
  14. 2020dm_control: Software and Tasks for Continuous Controlcited by 375
  15. 2022Video PreTraining (VPT): Learning to Act by Watching Unlabeled Online Videoscited by 345
  16. 2023ManiSkill2: A Unified Benchmark for Generalizable Manipulation Skillscited by 327
  17. 2023IDQL: Implicit Q-Learning as an Actor-Critic Method with Diffusion Policiescited by 325
  18. 2018Sim-to-Real: Learning Agile Locomotion For Quadruped Robotscited by 319
  19. 2021Randomized Ensembled Double Q-Learning: Learning Fast Without a Modelcited by 288
  20. 2020First return, then explorecited by 266
  21. 2019Self-Supervised Exploration via Disagreementcited by 265
  22. 2018Multi-Goal Reinforcement Learning: Challenging Robotics Environments and Request for Researchcited by 260
  23. 2017Count-Based Exploration with Neural Density Modelscited by 257
  24. 2018Provably Efficient Maximum Entropy Explorationcited by 242
  25. 2019Stochastic Latent Actor-Critic: Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Latent Variable Modelcited by 231
  26. 2018Model-Ensemble Trust-Region Policy Optimizationcited by 219
  27. 2021Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning via Balanced Replay and Pessimistic Q-Ensemblecited by 214
  28. 2019Go-Explore: a New Approach for Hard-Exploration Problemscited by 212
  29. 2020Never Give Up: Learning Directed Exploration Strategiescited by 212
  30. 2019Efficient Exploration via State Marginal Matchingcited by 188
  31. 2018Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Stochastic Ensemble Value Expansioncited by 168
  32. 2020Controlling Overestimation Bias with Truncated Mixture of Continuous Distributional Quantile Criticscited by 165
  33. 2019Benchmarking Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 162
  34. 2022Legged Locomotion in Challenging Terrains using Egocentric Visioncited by 151
  35. 2018Algorithmic Framework for Model-based Deep Reinforcement Learning with Theoretical Guaranteescited by 140
  36. 2022Offline Reinforcement Learning with Realizability and Single-policy Concentrabilitycited by 123
  37. 2020Maxmin Q-learning: Controlling the Estimation Bias of Q-learningcited by 117
  38. 2023Extreme Q-Learning: MaxEnt RL without Entropycited by 116

50 most cited of 85 All 85 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 9; 2025: 3; 2026: 6.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 20243D Diffusion Policy: Generalizable Visuomotor Policy Learning via Simple 3D Representationscited by 116
  2. 2024Bigger, Regularized, Optimistic: scaling for compute and sample-efficient continuous controlcited by 108
  3. 2024Efficient Online Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tuning Need Not Retain Offline Datacited by 63
  4. 2024Overestimation, Overfitting, and Plasticity in Actor-Critic: the Bitter Lesson of Reinforcement Learningcited by 50
  5. 2023DrM: Mastering Visual Reinforcement Learning through Dormant Ratio Minimizationcited by 47
  6. 2025Flow-Based Policy for Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 37
  7. 2023H2O+: An Improved Framework for Hybrid Offline-and-Online RL with Dynamics Gapscited by 17
  8. 2024ACE : Off-Policy Actor-Critic with Causality-Aware Entropy Regularizationcited by 16
  9. 2026Failure-Aware RL: Reliable Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning with Self-Recovery for Real-World Manipulationcited by 11
  10. 2024Offline-Boosted Actor-Critic: Adaptively Blending Optimal Historical Behaviors in Deep Off-Policy RLcited by 10
  11. 2024Value Improved Actor Critic Algorithmscited by 7
  12. 2024OMPO: A Unified Framework for RL under Policy and Dynamics Shiftscited by 5
8 more
  1. 2025β-DQN: Improving Deep Q-Learning By Evolving the Behaviorcited by 3
  2. 2026RE-SAC: Disentangling aleatoric and epistemic risks in bus fleet control: A stable and robust ensemble DRL approachcited by 2
  3. 2024AFU: Actor-Free critic Updates in off-policy RL for continuous controlcited by 1
  4. 2025Gradual Transition from Bellman Optimality Operator to Bellman Operator in Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
  5. 2026Peng's Q(λ) for Conservative Value Estimation in Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  6. 2026Expert Behavior Prior Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  7. 2026CARE-VI: Conservative Adaptive Reliability Estimation for Value Improvement in Off-Policy Actor-Critic Learningcited by 0
  8. 2026Improving Online Reinforcement Learning via Bidirectional Behavior Prior Distillationcited by 0