Gradual Transition from Bellman Optimality Operator to Bellman Operator in Online Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
For continuous action spaces, actor-critic methods are widely used in online reinforcement learning (RL). However, unlike RL algorithms for discrete actions, which generally model the optimal value function using the Bellman optimality operator, RL algorithms for continuous actions typically model Q-values for the current policy using the Bellman operator. These algorithms for continuous actions rely exclusively on policy updates for improvement, which often results in low sample efficiency. This study examines the effectiveness of incorporating the Bellman optimality operator into actor-critic frameworks. Experiments in a simple environment show that modeling optimal values accelerates learning but leads to overestimation bias. To address this, we propose an annealing approach that gradually transitions from the Bellman optimality operator to the Bellman operator, thereby accelerating learning while mitigating bias. Our method, combined with TD3 and SAC, significantly outperforms existing approaches across various locomotion and manipulation tasks, demonstrating improved performance and robustness to hyperparameters related to optimality. The code for this study is available at https://github.com/motokiomura/annealed-q-learning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2025.
Builds on
26 of 36 references.
References · 26
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,245
- 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,168
- 2019Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reductioncited by 833
- 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 781
- 2018QT-Opt: Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotic Manipulationcited by 730
- 2017Reinforcement Learning with Deep Energy-Based Policiescited by 659
14 more
- 2020dm_control: Software and Tasks for Continuous Controlcited by 368
- 2020Agent57: Outperforming the Atari Human Benchmarkcited by 300
- 2021Randomized Ensembled Double Q-Learning: Learning Fast Without a Modelcited by 278
- 2020Maxmin Q-learning: Controlling the Estimation Bias of Q-learningcited by 117
- 2023Offline RL with No OOD Actions: In-Sample Learning via Implicit Value Regularizationcited by 114
- 2023Extreme Q-Learning: MaxEnt RL without Entropycited by 113
- 2016A Deep Hierarchical Approach to Lifelong Learning in Minecraftcited by 90
- 2017Action Branching Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 90
- 2017Curriculum Dropoutcited by 50
- 2023Dual RL: Unification and New Methods for Reinforcement and Imitation Learningcited by 48
- 2022Solving Continuous Control via Q-learningcited by 21
- 2023Seizing Serendipity: Exploiting the Value of Past Success in Off-Policy Actor-Criticcited by 20
- 2024REValueD: Regularised Ensemble Value-Decomposition for Factorisable Markov Decision Processescited by 6
- 2024Growing Q-Networks: Solving Continuous Control Tasks with Adaptive Control Resolutioncited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.