mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Stylometric Detection of AI-Generated Text in Twitter Timelines

arXiv 2303.03697 ↗First posted 7 Mar 2023cs.CL cs.LGcited by 57

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advancements in pre-trained language models have enabled convenient methods for generating human-like text at a large scale. Though these generation capabilities hold great potential for breakthrough applications, it can also be a tool for an adversary to generate misinformation. In particular, social media platforms like Twitter are highly susceptible to AI-generated misinformation. A potential threat scenario is when an adversary hijacks a credible user account and incorporates a natural language generator to generate misinformation. Such threats necessitate automated detectors for AI-generated tweets in a given user's Twitter timeline. However, tweets are inherently short, thus making it difficult for current state-of-the-art pre-trained language model-based detectors to accurately detect at what point the AI starts to generate tweets in a given Twitter timeline. In this paper, we present a novel algorithm using stylometric signals to aid detecting AI-generated tweets. We propose models corresponding to quantifying stylistic changes in human and AI tweets in two related tasks: Task 1 - discriminate between human and AI-generated tweets, and Task 2 - detect if and when an AI starts to generate tweets in a given Twitter timeline. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that the stylometric features are effective in augmenting the state-of-the-art AI-generated text detectors.

Key facts. Cited by 57 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2023.

Builds on

14 of 30 references.

References · 14

  1. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  2. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
  3. 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 553
  4. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
  5. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
  6. 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 260
  7. 2020Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Surveycited by 160
  8. 2020TweepFake: about Detecting Deepfake Tweetscited by 117
  9. 2019Real or Fake? Learning to Discriminate Machine from Human Generated Textcited by 98
  10. 2019The Limitations of Stylometry for Detecting Machine-Generated Fake Newscited by 63
  11. 2021Artificial Text Detection via Examining the Topology of Attention Mapscited by 49
  12. 2021Heterogeneity-aware Twitter Bot Detection with Relational Graph Transformerscited by 41
2 more
  1. 2020Neural Deepfake Detection with Factual Structure of Textcited by 40
  2. 2020Fact-Enhanced Synthetic News Generationcited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 18; 2024: 13; 2025: 18; 2026: 8.

57 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?cited by 173
  2. 2023A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 101
  3. 2024Detecting Multimedia Generated by Large AI Models: A Surveycited by 73
  4. 2023Multiscale Positive-Unlabeled Detection of AI-Generated Textscited by 59
  5. 2024M4GT-Bench: Evaluation Benchmark for Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 43
  6. 2023Fighting Fire with Fire: Can ChatGPT Detect AI-generated Text?cited by 39
  7. 2023ConDA: Contrastive Domain Adaptation for AI-generated Text Detectioncited by 37
  8. 2023Anatomy of an AI-powered malicious social botnetcited by 35
  9. 2024SemEval-2024 Task 8: Multidomain, Multimodel and Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 30
  10. 2023How Reliable Are AI-Generated-Text Detectors? An Assessment Framework Using Evasive Soft Promptscited by 23
  11. 2024Detecting AI-Generated Text: Factors Influencing Detectability with Current Methodscited by 23
  12. 2023To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: That is the question!cited by 20
38 more
  1. 2024Detecting Machine-Generated Texts by Multi-Population Aware Optimization for Maximum Mean Discrepancycited by 20
  2. 2025AdaDetectGPT: Adaptive Detection of LLM-Generated Text with Statistical Guaranteescited by 20
  3. 2023Classification of Human- and AI-Generated Texts: Investigating Features for ChatGPTcited by 18
  4. 2024A Survey of AI-generated Text Forensic Systems: Detection, Attribution, and Characterizationcited by 18
  5. 2024StyloAI: Distinguishing AI-Generated Content with Stylometric Analysiscited by 17
  6. 2023Challenges and Remedies to Privacy and Security in AIGC: Exploring the Potential of Privacy Computing, Blockchain, and Beyondcited by 14
  7. 2023Counter Turing Test CT^2: AI-Generated Text Detection is Not as Easy as You May Think -- Introducing AI Detectability Indexcited by 14
  8. 2025Survey on AI-Generated Media Detection: From Non-MLLM to MLLMcited by 12
  9. 2023Neural Authorship Attribution: Stylometric Analysis on Large Language Modelscited by 11
  10. 2023J-Guard: Journalism Guided Adversarially Robust Detection of AI-generated Newscited by 10
  11. 2023TOPFORMER: Topology-Aware Authorship Attribution of Deepfake Texts with Diverse Writing Stylescited by 10
  12. 2026GPTZero: Robust Detection of LLM-Generated Textscited by 10
  13. 2025Benchmark of stylistic variation in LLM-generated textscited by 7
  14. 2025Linguistic and Embedding-Based Profiling of Texts generated by Humans and Large Language Modelscited by 6
  15. 2025Diversity Boosts AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 6
  16. 2023Classification of Human- and AI-Generated Texts for English, French, German, and Spanishcited by 4
  17. 2024KInIT at SemEval-2024 Task 8: Fine-tuned LLMs for Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 4
  18. 2025When Detection Fails: The Power of Fine-Tuned Models to Generate Human-Like Social Media Textcited by 4
  19. 2025Machines in the Crowd? Measuring the Footprint of Machine-Generated Text on Redditcited by 4
  20. 2025How Sampling Affects the Detectability of Machine-written texts: A Comprehensive Studycited by 4
  21. 2023Detecting The Corruption Of Online Questionnaires By Artificial Intelligencecited by 3
  22. 2024HULLMI: Human vs LLM identification with explainabilitycited by 3
  23. 2024MOSAIC: Multiple Observers Spotting AI Contentcited by 3
  24. 2025Robust and Fine-Grained Detection of AI Generated Textscited by 3
  25. 2025Distinguishing AI-Generated and Human-Written Text Through Psycholinguistic Analysiscited by 3
  26. 2025The Arabic AI Fingerprint: Stylometric Analysis and Detection of Large Language Models Textcited by 3
  27. 2025On the Detectability of LLM-Generated Text: What Exactly Is LLM-Generated Text?cited by 3
  28. 2023DEMASQ: Unmasking the ChatGPT Wordsmithcited by 2
  29. 2024Chain-of-MetaWriting: Linguistic and Textual Analysis of How Small Language Models Write Young Students Textscited by 2
  30. 2026Watermarking Should Be Treated as a Monitoring Primitivecited by 2
  31. 2024Misinformation is not about Bad Facts: An Analysis of the Production and Consumption of Fringe Contentcited by 1
  32. 2024Unmasking the Imposters: How Censorship and Domain Adaptation Affect the Detection of Machine-Generated Tweetscited by 1
  33. 2026Stylometry Analysis of Human and Machine Text for Academic Integritycited by 1
  34. 2026Assessing Deanonymization Risks with Stylometry-Assisted LLM Agentcited by 1
  35. 2023Machine-Generated Text Detection using Deep Learningcited by 0
  36. 2025Missing the human touch? A computational stylometry analysis of GPT-4 translations of online Chinese literaturecited by 0
  37. 2025Stylometry recognizes human and LLM-generated texts in short samplescited by 0
  38. 2025AINL-Eval 2025 Shared Task: Detection of AI-Generated Scientific Abstracts in Russiancited by 0

50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)