mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Distinguishing AI-Generated and Human-Written Text Through Psycholinguistic Analysis

arXiv 2505.01800 ↗First posted 3 May 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing sophistication of AI-generated texts highlights the urgent need for accurate and transparent detection tools, especially in educational settings, where verifying authorship is essential. Existing literature has demonstrated that the application of stylometric features with machine learning classifiers can yield excellent results. Building on this foundation, this study proposes a comprehensive framework that integrates stylometric analysis with psycholinguistic theories, offering a clear and interpretable approach to distinguishing between AI-generated and human-written texts. This research specifically maps 31 distinct stylometric features to cognitive processes such as lexical retrieval, discourse planning, cognitive load management, and metacognitive self-monitoring. In doing so, it highlights the unique psycholinguistic patterns found in human writing. Through the intersection of computational linguistics and cognitive science, this framework contributes to the development of reliable tools aimed at preserving academic integrity in the era of generative AI.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2025.

Builds on

10 of 23 references.

References · 10

  1. 2023Stylometric Detection of AI-Generated Text in Twitter Timelinescited by 59
  2. 2022Structured, flexible, and robust: benchmarking and improving large language models towards more human-like behavior in out-of-distribution reasoning taskscited by 56
  3. 2024Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challengescited by 47
  4. 2023Overview of AuTexTification at IberLEF 2023: Detection and Attribution of Machine-Generated Text in Multiple Domainscited by 31
  5. 2023Challenging the appearance of machine intelligence: Cognitive bias in LLMs and Best Practices for Adoptioncited by 21
  6. 2023Classification of Human- and AI-Generated Texts: Investigating Features for ChatGPTcited by 19
  7. 2024StyloAI: Distinguishing AI-Generated Content with Stylometric Analysiscited by 17
  8. 2023Conceptual structure coheres in human cognition but not in large language modelscited by 14
  9. 2023Language Models are Bounded Pragmatic Speakers: Understanding RLHF from a Bayesian Cognitive Modeling Perspectivecited by 10
  10. 2023On the Unexpected Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.