Classification of Human- and AI-Generated Texts for English, French, German, and Spanish
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper we analyze features to classify human- and AI-generated text for English, French, German and Spanish and compare them across languages. We investigate two scenarios: (1) The detection of text generated by AI from scratch, and (2) the detection of text rephrased by AI. For training and testing the classifiers in this multilingual setting, we created a new text corpus covering 10 topics for each language. For the detection of AI-generated text, the combination of all proposed features performs best, indicating that our features are portable to other related languages: The F1-scores are close with 99% for Spanish, 98% for English, 97% for German and 95% for French. For the detection of AI-rephrased text, the systems with all features outperform systems with other features in many cases, but using only document features performs best for German (72%) and Spanish (86%) and only text vector features leads to best results for English (78%).
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2023.
Builds on
17 of 32 references.
References · 17
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
- 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
- 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
- 2020Towards a Human-like Open-Domain Chatbotcited by 467
- 2022ChatGPT Makes Medicine Easy to Swallow: An Exploratory Case Study on Simplified Radiology Reportscited by 100
5 more
- 2023ChatGPT or Human? Detect and Explain. Explaining Decisions of Machine Learning Model for Detecting Short ChatGPT-generated Textcited by 84
- 2023Stylometric Detection of AI-Generated Text in Twitter Timelinescited by 57
- 2023Classification of Human- and AI-Generated Texts: Investigating Features for ChatGPTcited by 18
- 2023Distinguishing ChatGPT(-3.5, -4)-generated and human-written papers through Japanese stylometric analysiscited by 16
- 2023Comparing Abstractive Summaries Generated by ChatGPT to Real Summaries Through Blinded Reviewers and Text Classification Algorithmscited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024A Survey of AI-generated Text Forensic Systems: Detection, Attribution, and Characterizationcited by 18
- 2025CEAID: Benchmark of Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detection Methods for Central European Languagescited by 1
- 2025A Cross-Cultural Assessment of Human Ability to Detect LLM-Generated Fake News about South Africacited by 0
- 2026Interpretable Predictability-Based AI Text Detection: A Replication Studycited by 0
- 2026Interpretable Predictability-Based AI Text Detection: A Replication Study16 Mar 2026
- 2025A Cross-Cultural Assessment of Human Ability to Detect LLM-Generated Fake News about South Africa21 Nov 2025
- 2025CEAID: Benchmark of Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detection Methods for Central European Languages30 Sep 2025
- 2024A Survey of AI-generated Text Forensic Systems: Detection, Attribution, and Characterization2 Mar 2024