mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Machine-Generated Text Detection using Deep Learning

arXiv 2311.15425 ↗First posted 26 Nov 2023cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Our research focuses on the crucial challenge of discerning text produced by Large Language Models (LLMs) from human-generated text, which holds significance for various applications. With ongoing discussions about attaining a model with such functionality, we present supporting evidence regarding the feasibility of such models. We evaluated our models on multiple datasets, including Twitter Sentiment, Football Commentary, Project Gutenberg, PubMedQA, and SQuAD, confirming the efficacy of the enhanced detection approaches. These datasets were sampled with intricate constraints encompassing every possibility, laying the foundation for future research. We evaluate GPT-3.5-Turbo against various detectors such as SVM, RoBERTa-base, and RoBERTa-large. Based on the research findings, the results predominantly relied on the sequence length of the sentence.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2023.

Builds on

8 of 12 references.

References · 8

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
  4. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 513
  5. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
  6. 2023On the Possibilities of AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 88
  7. 2023Stylometric Detection of AI-Generated Text in Twitter Timelinescited by 59
  8. 2018An Improved Text Sentiment Classification Model Using TF-IDF and Next Word Negationcited by 16

Built on by

Not cited yet.