mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Classification of Human- and AI-Generated Texts: Investigating Features for ChatGPT

arXiv 2308.05341 ↗First posted 10 Aug 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, generative AIs like ChatGPT have become available to the wide public. These tools can for instance be used by students to generate essays or whole theses. But how does a teacher know whether a text is written by a student or an AI? In our work, we explore traditional and new features to (1) detect text generated by AI from scratch and (2) text rephrased by AI. Since we found that classification is more difficult when the AI has been instructed to create the text in a way that a human would not recognize that it was generated by an AI, we also investigate this more advanced case. For our experiments, we produced a new text corpus covering 10 school topics. Our best systems to classify basic and advanced human-generated/AI-generated texts have F1-scores of over 96%. Our best systems for classifying basic and advanced human-generated/AI-rephrased texts have F1-scores of more than 78%. The systems use a combination of perplexity, semantic, list lookup, error-based, readability, AI feedback, and text vector features. Our results show that the new features substantially help to improve the performance of many classifiers. Our best basic text rephrasing detection system even outperforms GPTZero by 183.8% relative in F1-score.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2023.

Builds on

14 of 32 references.

References · 14

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  5. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  6. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
  7. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
  8. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
  9. 2020Towards a Human-like Open-Domain Chatbotcited by 467
  10. 2022ChatGPT Makes Medicine Easy to Swallow: An Exploratory Case Study on Simplified Radiology Reportscited by 100
  11. 2023ChatGPT or Human? Detect and Explain. Explaining Decisions of Machine Learning Model for Detecting Short ChatGPT-generated Textcited by 84
  12. 2023Stylometric Detection of AI-Generated Text in Twitter Timelinescited by 57
2 more
  1. 2023Distinguishing ChatGPT(-3.5, -4)-generated and human-written papers through Japanese stylometric analysiscited by 16
  2. 2023Comparing Abstractive Summaries Generated by ChatGPT to Real Summaries Through Blinded Reviewers and Text Classification Algorithmscited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 10; 2026: 1.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Double-I Watermark: Protecting Model Copyright for LLM Fine-tuningcited by 18
  2. 2024StyloAI: Distinguishing AI-Generated Content with Stylometric Analysiscited by 17
  3. 2024Detecting Machine-Generated Texts: Not Just "AI vs Humans" and Explainability is Complicatedcited by 15
  4. 2025Position: The ML Community Must Build an AI-Augmented Peer-Review Ecosystemcited by 8
  5. 2025Linguistic Characteristics of AI-Generated Text: A Surveycited by 7
  6. 2024Humanizing the Machine: Proxy Attacks to Mislead LLM Detectorscited by 6
  7. 2025How Large Language Models Are Changing MOOC Essay Answers: A Comparison of Pre- and Post-LLM Responsescited by 5
  8. 2025Limits of LLM Text Detectors in Educationcited by 5
  9. 2023Classification of Human- and AI-Generated Texts for English, French, German, and Spanishcited by 4
  10. 2025Tracing Thought: Using Chain-of-Thought Reasoning to Identify the LLM Behind AI-Generated Textcited by 3
  11. 2025Distinguishing AI-Generated and Human-Written Text Through Psycholinguistic Analysiscited by 3
  12. 2023An Information-Theoretic Approach for Detecting Edits in AI-Generated Textcited by 2
6 more
  1. 2024Distinguishing Chatbot from Humancited by 2
  2. 2025SPADE: Structured Prompting Augmentation for Dialogue Enhancement in Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 1
  3. 2026Assessing Deanonymization Risks with Stylometry-Assisted LLM Agentcited by 1
  4. 2025Chameleon: Benchmarking Detection and Backtracking on Commercial-Grade AI-Generated Videoscited by 0
  5. 2025Measuring Human Involvement in AI-Generated Text: A Case Study on Academic Writingcited by 0
  6. 2025A Cross-Cultural Assessment of Human Ability to Detect LLM-Generated Fake News about South Africacited by 0