MOSAIC: Multiple Observers Spotting AI Content
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The dissemination of Large Language Models (LLMs), trained at scale, and endowed with powerful text-generating abilities, has made it easier for all to produce harmful, toxic, faked or forged content. In response, various proposals have been made to automatically discriminate artificially generated from human-written texts, typically framing the problem as a binary classification problem. Early approaches evaluate an input document with a well-chosen detector LLM, assuming that low-perplexity scores reliably signal machine-made content. More recent systems instead consider two LLMs and compare their probability distributions over the document to further discriminate when perplexity alone cannot. However, using a fixed pair of models can induce brittleness in performance. We extend these approaches to the ensembling of several LLMs and derive a new, theoretically grounded approach to combine their respective strengths. Our experiments, conducted with various generator LLMs, indicate that this approach effectively leverages the strengths of each model, resulting in robust detection performance across multiple domains. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/BaggerOfWords/MOSAIC .
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2024.
Builds on
33 of 45 references.
References · 33
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
- 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 553
- 2023The Falcon Series of Open Language Modelscited by 526
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
- 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
- 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 278
- 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 260
21 more
- 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 255
- 2024Tower: An Open Multilingual Large Language Model for Translation-Related Taskscited by 205
- 2024RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 157
- 2023DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Textcited by 127
- 2022Truncation Sampling as Language Model Desmoothingcited by 121
- 2023M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 118
- 2020TweepFake: about Detecting Deepfake Tweetscited by 117
- 2023ChatGPT or Human? Detect and Explain. Explaining Decisions of Machine Learning Model for Detecting Short ChatGPT-generated Textcited by 84
- 2023Stylometric Detection of AI-Generated Text in Twitter Timelinescited by 57
- 2023SeqXGPT: Sentence-Level AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 55
- 2024Raidar: geneRative AI Detection viA Rewritingcited by 51
- 2023Origin Tracing and Detecting of LLMscited by 39
- 2023HowkGPT: Investigating the Detection of ChatGPT-generated University Student Homework through Context-Aware Perplexity Analysiscited by 30
- 2023On the Detectability of ChatGPT Content: Benchmarking, Methodology, and Evaluation through the Lens of Academic Writingcited by 26
- 2023From Text to Source: Results in Detecting Large Language Model-Generated Contentcited by 25
- 2024Stumbling Blocks: Stress Testing the Robustness of Machine-Generated Text Detectors Under Attackscited by 25
- 2024LLM-DetectAIve: a Tool for Fine-Grained Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 25
- 2022A Benchmark Corpus for the Detection of Automatically Generated Text in Academic Publicationscited by 18
- 2023On the Efficacy of Sampling Adapterscited by 17
- 2023An Ensemble Method Based on the Combination of Transformers with Convolutional Neural Networks to Detect Artificially Generated Textcited by 2
- 2021On Universal D-Semifaithful Coding for Memoryless Sources with Infinite Alphabetscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.