mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neural Deepfake Detection with Factual Structure of Text

arXiv 2010.07475 ↗First posted 15 Oct 2020cs.CLcited by 40

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deepfake detection, the task of automatically discriminating machine-generated text, is increasingly critical with recent advances in natural language generative models. Existing approaches to deepfake detection typically represent documents with coarse-grained representations. However, they struggle to capture factual structures of documents, which is a discriminative factor between machine-generated and human-written text according to our statistical analysis. To address this, we propose a graph-based model that utilizes the factual structure of a document for deepfake detection of text. Our approach represents the factual structure of a given document as an entity graph, which is further utilized to learn sentence representations with a graph neural network. Sentence representations are then composed to a document representation for making predictions, where consistent relations between neighboring sentences are sequentially modeled. Results of experiments on two public deepfake datasets show that our approach significantly improves strong base models built with RoBERTa. Model analysis further indicates that our model can distinguish the difference in the factual structure between machine-generated text and human-written text.

Key facts. Cited by 40 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 7; 2023: 15; 2024: 8; 2025: 7; 2026: 1.

40 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?cited by 173
  2. 2023On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Modelscited by 170
  3. 2021A Token-level Reference-free Hallucination Detection Benchmark for Free-form Text Generationcited by 137
  4. 2023MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wildcited by 130
  5. 2023The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Textscited by 126
  6. 2021TURINGBENCH: A Benchmark Environment for Turing Test in the Age of Neural Text Generationcited by 118
  7. 2023A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 101
  8. 2023Stylometric Detection of AI-Generated Text in Twitter Timelinescited by 57
  9. 2024M4GT-Bench: Evaluation Benchmark for Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 43
  10. 2022Attribution and Obfuscation of Neural Text Authorship: A Data Mining Perspectivecited by 40
  11. 2023GPT-who: An Information Density-based Machine-Generated Text Detectorcited by 38
  12. 2022Deepfake Text Detection: Limitations and Opportunitiescited by 37
28 more
  1. 2023Machine-Made Media: Monitoring the Mobilization of Machine-Generated Articles on Misinformation and Mainstream News Websitescited by 37
  2. 2022CoCo: Coherence-Enhanced Machine-Generated Text Detection Under Data Limitation With Contrastive Learningcited by 32
  3. 2024Token-Specific Watermarking with Enhanced Detectability and Semantic Coherence for Large Language Modelscited by 30
  4. 2024SemEval-2024 Task 8: Multidomain, Multimodel and Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 30
  5. 2022Faithfulness in Natural Language Generation: A Systematic Survey of Analysis, Evaluation and Optimization Methodscited by 27
  6. 2024Detecting AI-Generated Text: Factors Influencing Detectability with Current Methodscited by 23
  7. 2023Does Human Collaboration Enhance the Accuracy of Identifying LLM-Generated Deepfake Texts?cited by 21
  8. 2024A Survey of AI-generated Text Forensic Systems: Detection, Attribution, and Characterizationcited by 18
  9. 2024Text Generation: A Systematic Literature Review of Tasks, Evaluation, and Challengescited by 18
  10. 2022Paraphrase Identification with Deep Learning: A Review of Datasets and Methodscited by 13
  11. 2024Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Text using Token Cohesivenesscited by 13
  12. 2023IMGTB: A Framework for Machine-Generated Text Detection Benchmarkingcited by 12
  13. 2023Stochastic Parrots Looking for Stochastic Parrots: LLMs are Easy to Fine-Tune and Hard to Detect with other LLMscited by 8
  14. 2024Fake Artificial Intelligence Generated Contents (FAIGC): A Survey of Theories, Detection Methods, and Opportunitiescited by 7
  15. 2022Automatic Detection of Entity-Manipulated Text using Factual Knowledgecited by 5
  16. 2023Break it, Imitate it, Fix it: Robustness by Generating Human-Like Attackscited by 5
  17. 2025Large Language Model Sourcing: A Surveycited by 5
  18. 2023Detection of Fake Generated Scientific Abstractscited by 3
  19. 2023Stacking the Odds: Transformer-Based Ensemble for AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 3
  20. 2025Tracing Thought: Using Chain-of-Thought Reasoning to Identify the LLM Behind AI-Generated Textcited by 3
  21. 2022Synthetic Text Detection: Systemic Literature Reviewcited by 2
  22. 2025Kill two birds with one stone: generalized and robust AI-generated text detection via dynamic perturbationscited by 2
  23. 2025GradEscape: A Gradient-Based Evader Against AI-Generated Text Detectorscited by 2
  24. 2025Advancing Machine-Generated Text Detection from an Easy to Hard Supervision Perspectivecited by 2
  25. 2025Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Code via Approximated Task Conditioningcited by 1
  26. 2023Do Stochastic Parrots have Feelings Too? Improving Neural Detection of Synthetic Text via Emotion Recognitioncited by 0
  27. 2025CODE ACROSTIC: Robust Watermarking for Code Generationcited by 0
  28. 2026Hidden Human-Like Nature of Machine-Generated Texts: Theory and Detection Enhancementcited by 0