mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CoCo: Coherence-Enhanced Machine-Generated Text Detection Under Data Limitation With Contrastive Learning

arXiv 2212.10341 ↗First posted 20 Dec 2022cs.CLcited by 33

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine-Generated Text (MGT) detection, a task that discriminates MGT from Human-Written Text (HWT), plays a crucial role in preventing misuse of text generative models, which excel in mimicking human writing style recently. Latest proposed detectors usually take coarse text sequences as input and fine-tune pretrained models with standard cross-entropy loss. However, these methods fail to consider the linguistic structure of texts. Moreover, they lack the ability to handle the low-resource problem which could often happen in practice considering the enormous amount of textual data online. In this paper, we present a coherence-based contrastive learning model named CoCo to detect the possible MGT under low-resource scenario. To exploit the linguistic feature, we encode coherence information in form of graph into text representation. To tackle the challenges of low data resource, we employ a contrastive learning framework and propose an improved contrastive loss for preventing performance degradation brought by simple samples. The experiment results on two public datasets and two self-constructed datasets prove our approach outperforms the state-of-art methods significantly. Also, we surprisingly find that MGTs originated from up-to-date language models could be easier to detect than these from previous models, in our experiments. And we propose some preliminary explanations for this counter-intuitive phenomena. All the codes and datasets are open-sourced.

Key facts. Cited by 33 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2022.

Builds on

41 of 73 references.

References · 41

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  5. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  6. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  7. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  8. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  9. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  10. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
  11. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
  12. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,173
29 more
  1. 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,256
  2. 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 799
  3. 2019CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generationcited by 762
  4. 2022GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Modelcited by 713
  5. 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
  6. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 513
  7. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
  8. 2020Understanding the Behaviour of Contrastive Losscited by 398
  9. 2018Graph Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 345
  10. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learning for Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuningcited by 276
  11. 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 261
  12. 2019Probing Neural Network Comprehension of Natural Language Argumentscited by 214
  13. 2021TURINGBENCH: A Benchmark Environment for Turing Test in the Age of Neural Text Generationcited by 120
  14. 2019Real or Fake? Learning to Discriminate Machine from Human Generated Textcited by 99
  15. 2019Do Massively Pretrained Language Models Make Better Storytellers?cited by 90
  16. 2017Semi-supervised sequence tagging with bidirectional language modelscited by 86
  17. 2021Few-Shot Bot: Prompt-Based Learning for Dialogue Systemscited by 64
  18. 2019Generating Sentiment-Preserving Fake Online Reviews Using Neural Language Models and Their Human- and Machine-based Detectioncited by 52
  19. 2020Are all negatives created equal in contrastive instance discrimination?cited by 50
  20. 2020Tensor Graph Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 49
  21. 2020Neural Deepfake Detection with Factual Structure of Textcited by 41
  22. 2022Faking Fake News for Real Fake News Detection: Propaganda-loaded Training Data Generationcited by 41
  23. 2019Syntax-Aware Aspect Level Sentiment Classification with Graph Attention Networkscited by 40
  24. 2021Coherence boosting: When your pretrained language model is not paying enough attentioncited by 38
  25. 2021TaCL: Improving BERT Pre-training with Token-aware Contrastive Learningcited by 32
  26. 2022Supervised Prototypical Contrastive Learning for Emotion Recognition in Conversationcited by 31
  27. 2022Dual Contrastive Learning: Text Classification via Label-Aware Data Augmentationcited by 23
  28. 2021Graph Ensemble Learning over Multiple Dependency Trees for Aspect-level Sentiment Classificationcited by 13
  29. 2020Improving Language Generation with Sentence Coherence Objectivecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 11; 2024: 14; 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

33 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviewscited by 164
  2. 2023The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Textscited by 128
  3. 2024Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Paperscited by 118
  4. 2023A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 105
  5. 2024Detecting Multimedia Generated by Large AI Models: A Surveycited by 76
  6. 2023A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Contentcited by 71
  7. 2023Multiscale Positive-Unlabeled Detection of AI-Generated Textscited by 61
  8. 2024M4GT-Bench: Evaluation Benchmark for Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 43
  9. 2023GPT-who: An Information Density-based Machine-Generated Text Detectorcited by 40
  10. 2024SemEval-2024 Task 8: Multidomain, Multimodel and Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 30
  11. 2024Between Lines of Code: Unraveling the Distinct Patterns of Machine and Human Programmerscited by 27
  12. 2024Stumbling Blocks: Stress Testing the Robustness of Machine-Generated Text Detectors Under Attackscited by 26
21 more
  1. 2024Permute-and-Flip: An optimally stable and watermarkable decoder for LLMscited by 22
  2. 2023Does Human Collaboration Enhance the Accuracy of Identifying LLM-Generated Deepfake Texts?cited by 21
  3. 2023User Modeling in the Era of Large Language Models: Current Research and Future Directionscited by 18
  4. 2024Threads of Subtlety: Detecting Machine-Generated Texts Through Discourse Motifscited by 18
  5. 2023A Simple yet Efficient Ensemble Approach for AI-generated Text Detectioncited by 12
  6. 2023On the Zero-Shot Generalization of Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 11
  7. 2025Human Texts Are Outliers: Detecting LLM-generated Texts via Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 8
  8. 2024ToBlend: Token-Level Blending With an Ensemble of LLMs to Attack AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 6
  9. 2025Large Language Model Sourcing: A Surveycited by 5
  10. 2024PetKaz at SemEval-2024 Task 8: Can Linguistics Capture the Specifics of LLM-generated Text?cited by 4
  11. 2023Detection of Fake Generated Scientific Abstractscited by 3
  12. 2023Stacking the Odds: Transformer-Based Ensemble for AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 3
  13. 2024TM-TREK at SemEval-2024 Task 8: Towards LLM-Based Automatic Boundary Detection for Human-Machine Mixed Textcited by 3
  14. 2024AISPACE at SemEval-2024 task 8: A Class-balanced Soft-voting System for Detecting Multi-generator Machine-generated Textcited by 3
  15. 2025Tracing Thought: Using Chain-of-Thought Reasoning to Identify the LLM Behind AI-Generated Textcited by 3
  16. 2026Merging Triggers, Breaking Backdoors: Defensive Poisoning for Instruction-Tuned Language Modelscited by 3
  17. 2024Style-News: Incorporating Stylized News Generation and Adversarial Verification for Neural Fake News Detectioncited by 2
  18. 2026Beyond Raw Detection Scores: Markov-Informed Calibration for Boosting Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 2
  19. 2026MGTEVAL: An Interactive Platform for Systemtic Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 0
  20. 2026Fight Poison with Poison: Enhancing Robustness in Few-shot Machine-Generated Text Detection with Adversarial Trainingcited by 0
  21. 2026Multi-Level Contextual Token Relation Modeling for Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 0