On the Zero-Shot Generalization of Machine-Generated Text Detectors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rampant proliferation of large language models, fluent enough to generate text indistinguishable from human-written language, gives unprecedented importance to the detection of machine-generated text. This work is motivated by an important research question: How will the detectors of machine-generated text perform on outputs of a new generator, that the detectors were not trained on? We begin by collecting generation data from a wide range of LLMs, and train neural detectors on data from each generator and test its performance on held-out generators. While none of the detectors can generalize to all generators, we observe a consistent and interesting pattern that the detectors trained on data from a medium-size LLM can zero-shot generalize to the larger version. As a concrete application, we demonstrate that robust detectors can be built on an ensemble of training data from medium-sized models.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2023.
Builds on
24 of 37 references.
References · 24
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,856
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,549
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,072
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,500
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,007
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,893
- 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,779
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,379
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,282
- 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 717
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 717
12 more
- 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
- 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 511
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 492
- 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 261
- 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 207
- 2023GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writerscited by 176
- 2020Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Surveycited by 165
- 2020Adversarial Watermarking Transformer: Towards Tracing Text Provenance with Data Hidingcited by 130
- 2019Real or Fake? Learning to Discriminate Machine from Human Generated Textcited by 99
- 2022Real or Fake Text?: Investigating Human Ability to Detect Boundaries Between Human-Written and Machine-Generated Textcited by 63
- 2023Smaller Language Models are Better Black-box Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 35
- 2022CoCo: Coherence-Enhanced Machine-Generated Text Detection Under Data Limitation With Contrastive Learningcited by 32
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 7; 2025: 3.
11 papers.
- 2024RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 158
- 2024Watermark Stealing in Large Language Modelscited by 91
- 2024Detecting Multimedia Generated by Large AI Models: A Surveycited by 75
- 2023A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Contentcited by 71
- 2024Technical Report on the Pangram AI-Generated Text Classifiercited by 33
- 2024What Does the Bot Say? Opportunities and Risks of Large Language Models in Social Media Bot Detectioncited by 25
- 2024Stumbling Blocks: Stress Testing the Robustness of Machine-Generated Text Detectors Under Attackscited by 25
- 2025PMark: Towards Robust and Distortion-free Semantic-level Watermarking with Channel Constraintscited by 15
- 2025HACo-Det: A Study Towards Fine-Grained Machine-Generated Text Detection under Human-AI Coauthoringcited by 14
- 2024EAGLE: A Domain Generalization Framework for AI-generated Text Detectioncited by 13
- 2025Modeling the Attack: Detecting AI-Generated Text by Quantifying Adversarial Perturbationscited by 2
- 2025PMark: Towards Robust and Distortion-free Semantic-level Watermarking with Channel Constraints25 Sep 2025
- 2025Modeling the Attack: Detecting AI-Generated Text by Quantifying Adversarial Perturbations22 Sep 2025
- 2025HACo-Det: A Study Towards Fine-Grained Machine-Generated Text Detection under Human-AI Coauthoring3 Jun 2025
- 2024RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectors13 May 2024
- 2024EAGLE: A Domain Generalization Framework for AI-generated Text Detection23 Mar 2024
- 2024Watermark Stealing in Large Language Models29 Feb 2024
- 2024Technical Report on the Pangram AI-Generated Text Classifier21 Feb 2024
- 2024Stumbling Blocks: Stress Testing the Robustness of Machine-Generated Text Detectors Under Attacks18 Feb 2024
- 2024What Does the Bot Say? Opportunities and Risks of Large Language Models in Social Media Bot Detection1 Feb 2024
- 2024Detecting Multimedia Generated by Large AI Models: A Survey22 Jan 2024
- 2023A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Content24 Oct 2023