mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

On the Zero-Shot Generalization of Machine-Generated Text Detectors

arXiv 2310.05165 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2023cs.CLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rampant proliferation of large language models, fluent enough to generate text indistinguishable from human-written language, gives unprecedented importance to the detection of machine-generated text. This work is motivated by an important research question: How will the detectors of machine-generated text perform on outputs of a new generator, that the detectors were not trained on? We begin by collecting generation data from a wide range of LLMs, and train neural detectors on data from each generator and test its performance on held-out generators. While none of the detectors can generalize to all generators, we observe a consistent and interesting pattern that the detectors trained on data from a medium-size LLM can zero-shot generalize to the larger version. As a concrete application, we demonstrate that robust detectors can be built on an ensemble of training data from medium-sized models.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2023.

Builds on

24 of 37 references.

References · 24

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,856
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,549
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,072
  5. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,500
  6. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,007
  7. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,893
  8. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,779
  9. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,379
  10. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,282
  11. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 717
  12. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 717
12 more
  1. 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
  2. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 511
  3. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 492
  4. 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 261
  5. 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 207
  6. 2023GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writerscited by 176
  7. 2020Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Surveycited by 165
  8. 2020Adversarial Watermarking Transformer: Towards Tracing Text Provenance with Data Hidingcited by 130
  9. 2019Real or Fake? Learning to Discriminate Machine from Human Generated Textcited by 99
  10. 2022Real or Fake Text?: Investigating Human Ability to Detect Boundaries Between Human-Written and Machine-Generated Textcited by 63
  11. 2023Smaller Language Models are Better Black-box Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 35
  12. 2022CoCo: Coherence-Enhanced Machine-Generated Text Detection Under Data Limitation With Contrastive Learningcited by 32

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 7; 2025: 3.

11 papers.