TM-TREK at SemEval-2024 Task 8: Towards LLM-Based Automatic Boundary Detection for Human-Machine Mixed Text
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the increasing prevalence of text generated by large language models (LLMs), there is a growing concern about distinguishing between LLM-generated and human-written texts in order to prevent the misuse of LLMs, such as the dissemination of misleading information and academic dishonesty. Previous research has primarily focused on classifying text as either entirely human-written or LLM-generated, neglecting the detection of mixed texts that contain both types of content. This paper explores LLMs' ability to identify boundaries in human-written and machine-generated mixed texts. We approach this task by transforming it into a token classification problem and regard the label turning point as the boundary. Notably, our ensemble model of LLMs achieved first place in the 'Human-Machine Mixed Text Detection' sub-task of the SemEval'24 Competition Task 8. Additionally, we investigate factors that influence the capability of LLMs in detecting boundaries within mixed texts, including the incorporation of extra layers on top of LLMs, combination of segmentation loss, and the impact of pretraining. Our findings aim to provide valuable insights for future research in this area.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2024.
Builds on
14 of 17 references.
References · 14
- 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
- 2020Big Bird: Transformers for Longer Sequencescited by 1,673
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
- 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 553
- 2015Bidirectional LSTM-CRF Models for Sequence Taggingcited by 544
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
- 2020A survey of loss functions for semantic segmentationcited by 216
- 2020Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Surveycited by 160
- 2020TweepFake: about Detecting Deepfake Tweetscited by 117
- 2022Real or Fake Text?: Investigating Human Ability to Detect Boundaries Between Human-Written and Machine-Generated Textcited by 63
- 2023GPT-who: An Information Density-based Machine-Generated Text Detectorcited by 38
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2024SemEval-2024 Task 8: Multidomain, Multimodel and Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 30
- 2025Fine-Grained Detection of AI-Generated Text Using Sentence-Level Segmentationcited by 3
- 2026NeuroSymbolic AI for Legal AI-TRISM: Trustworthy, Reliable, Interpretable, Safe Modelscited by 1
- 2026NeuroSymbolic AI for Legal AI-TRISM: Trustworthy, Reliable, Interpretable, Safe Models5 Apr 2026
- 2025Fine-Grained Detection of AI-Generated Text Using Sentence-Level Segmentation22 Sep 2025
- 2024SemEval-2024 Task 8: Multidomain, Multimodel and Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detection22 Apr 2024