Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present an approach for estimating the fraction of text in a large corpus which is likely to be substantially modified or produced by a large language model (LLM). Our maximum likelihood model leverages expert-written and AI-generated reference texts to accurately and efficiently examine real-world LLM-use at the corpus level. We apply this approach to a case study of scientific peer review in AI conferences that took place after the release of ChatGPT: ICLR 2024, NeurIPS 2023, CoRL 2023 and EMNLP 2023. Our results suggest that between 6.5% and 16.9% of text submitted as peer reviews to these conferences could have been substantially modified by LLMs, i.e. beyond spell-checking or minor writing updates. The circumstances in which generated text occurs offer insight into user behavior: the estimated fraction of LLM-generated text is higher in reviews which report lower confidence, were submitted close to the deadline, and from reviewers who are less likely to respond to author rebuttals. We also observe corpus-level trends in generated text which may be too subtle to detect at the individual level, and discuss the implications of such trends on peer review. We call for future interdisciplinary work to examine how LLM use is changing our information and knowledge practices.
Key facts. Cited by 160 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2024.
Builds on
45 of 85 references.
References · 45
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
- 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 667
- 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 553
- 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
- 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 372
- 2021All That's 'Human' Is Not Gold: Evaluating Human Evaluation of Generated Textcited by 287
- 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 279
- 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 278
- 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 260
33 more
- 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Textcited by 259
- 2023The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learningcited by 251
- 2023Assessing Cross-Cultural Alignment between ChatGPT and Human Societies: An Empirical Studycited by 203
- 2023Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysiscited by 195
- 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 187
- 2023GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writerscited by 175
- 2020Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Surveycited by 160
- 2023Having Beer after Prayer? Measuring Cultural Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 153
- 2022Probing Pre-Trained Language Models for Cross-Cultural Differences in Valuescited by 147
- 2023DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Textcited by 127
- 2023ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewingcited by 118
- 2020TweepFake: about Detecting Deepfake Tweetscited by 117
- 2023Intrinsic Dimension Estimation for Robust Detection of AI-Generated Textscited by 111
- 2023Unbiased Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 100
- 2019Real or Fake? Learning to Discriminate Machine from Human Generated Textcited by 98
- 2021Algorithmic Monoculture and Social Welfarecited by 98
- 2023A Semantic Invariant Robust Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 97
- 2022Picking on the Same Person: Does Algorithmic Monoculture lead to Outcome Homogenization?cited by 89
- 2023On the Possibilities of AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 88
- 2023Testing of Detection Tools for AI-Generated Textcited by 86
- 2023Three Bricks to Consolidate Watermarks for Large Language Modelscited by 80
- 2023Robust Multi-bit Natural Language Watermarking through Invariant Featurescited by 76
- 2022Machine Generated Text: A Comprehensive Survey of Threat Models and Detection Methodscited by 75
- 2023A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Contentcited by 70
- 2022NLPeer: A Unified Resource for the Computational Study of Peer Reviewcited by 60
- 2023Red Teaming Language Model Detectors with Language Modelscited by 55
- 2023Watermarking Conditional Text Generation for AI Detection: Unveiling Challenges and a Semantic-Aware Watermark Remedycited by 45
- 2023GPT-Sentinel: Distinguishing Human and ChatGPT Generated Contentcited by 40
- 2020Attacking Neural Text Detectorscited by 37
- 2022CoCo: Coherence-Enhanced Machine-Generated Text Detection Under Data Limitation With Contrastive Learningcited by 32
- 2022Yes-Yes-Yes: Proactive Data Collection for ACL Rolling Review and Beyondcited by 12
- 2023New Evaluation Metrics Capture Quality Degradation due to LLM Watermarkingcited by 10
- 2023Assaying on the Robustness of Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 40; 2025: 48; 2026: 72.
160 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2024Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Paperscited by 112
- 2024Is A Picture Worth A Thousand Words? Delving Into Spatial Reasoning for Vision Language Modelscited by 111
- 2025DeepReview: Improving LLM-based Paper Review with Human-like Deep Thinking Processcited by 97
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Scientific Large Language Models and Their Applications in Scientific Discoverycited by 96
- 2024AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM Agentscited by 92
- 2024Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabularycited by 75
- 2024On the Algorithmic Bias of Aligning Large Language Models with RLHF: Preference Collapse and Matching Regularizationcited by 72
- 2024Do LLMs write like humans? Variation in grammatical and rhetorical stylescited by 62
- 2025Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A surveycited by 59
- 2024Game-theoretic LLM: Agent Workflow for Negotiation Gamescited by 55
- 2025The Widespread Adoption of Large Language Model-Assisted Writing Across Societycited by 50
- 2024Detection and Measurement of Syntactic Templates in Generated Textcited by 44
38 more
- 2025Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025cited by 40
- 2025Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewardscited by 34
- 2024Conv-Basis: A New Paradigm for Efficient Attention Inference and Gradient Computation in Transformerscited by 32
- 2024Training Tensor Attention Efficiently: From Cubic to Almost Linear Timecited by 29
- 2024Is ChatGPT Transforming Academics' Writing Style?cited by 26
- 2024On Behalf of the Stakeholders: Trends in NLP Model Interpretability in the Era of LLMscited by 24
- 2025Prototypical Human-AI Collaboration Behaviors from LLM-Assisted Writing in the Wildcited by 24
- 2024Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Investigating AI Text Detectability in Peer Reviewcited by 19
- 2024Do Large Language Models Have an English Accent? Evaluating and Improving the Naturalness of Multilingual LLMscited by 19
- 2025LLM-Generated Fake News Induces Truth Decay in News Ecosystem: A Case Study on Neural News Recommendationcited by 19
- 2024The Impact of Large Language Models in Academia: from Writing to Speakingcited by 18
- 2025Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Benchmarking AI Text Detection in Peer Reviewcited by 18
- 2025Detecting LLM-Generated Peer Reviewscited by 18
- 2024AIGS: Generating Science from AI-Powered Automated Falsificationcited by 17
- 2025The Good, the Bad and the Constructive: Automatically Measuring Peer Review's Utility for Authorscited by 16
- 2024Exploring the Frontiers of Softmax: Provable Optimization, Applications in Diffusion Model, and Beyondcited by 15
- 2024Usefulness of LLMs as an Author Checklist Assistant for Scientific Papers: NeurIPS'24 Experimentcited by 15
- 2025Human-LLM Coevolution: Evidence from Academic Writingcited by 15
- 2026AI-Assisted Peer Review at Scale: The AAAI-26 AI Review Pilotcited by 15
- 2024Lies, Damned Lies, and Distributional Language Statistics: Persuasion and Deception with Large Language Modelscited by 14
- 2025ReviewerToo: Should AI Join The Program Committee? A Look At The Future of Peer Reviewcited by 12
- 2026Stop Automating Peer Review Without Rigorous Evaluationcited by 12
- 2024Evaluating the Predictive Capacity of ChatGPT for Academic Peer Review Outcomes Across Multiple Platformscited by 11
- 2025The Lock-in Hypothesis: Stagnation by Algorithmcited by 11
- 2025From Replication to Redesign: Exploring Pairwise Comparisons for LLM-Based Peer Reviewcited by 11
- 2024Developing Story: Case Studies of Generative AI's Use in Journalismcited by 10
- 2024System 2 thinking in OpenAI's o1-preview model: Near-perfect performance on a mathematics examcited by 10
- 2025Your Language Model Can Secretly Write Like Humans: Contrastive Paraphrase Attacks on LLM-Generated Text Detectorscited by 10
- 2025Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation Frameworkcited by 10
- 2025In-Context Watermarks for Large Language Modelscited by 9
- 2025Evolving Roles of LLMs in Scientific Innovation: Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluatorcited by 9
- 2025AI use in American newspapers is widespread, uneven, and rarely disclosedcited by 9
- 2024Examining the Prevalence and Dynamics of AI-Generated Media in Art Subredditscited by 8
- 2024'Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?' Who will watch the watchmen? On Detecting AI-generated peer-reviewscited by 8
- 2024Large Language Models Engineer Too Many Simple Features For Tabular Datacited by 8
- 2024Why Does ChatGPT "Delve" So Much? Exploring the Sources of Lexical Overrepresentation in Large Language Modelscited by 8
- 2025From Hypothesis to Publication: A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Driven Research Support Systemscited by 8
- 2025BadScientist: Can a Research Agent Write Convincing but Unsound Papers that Fool LLM Reviewers?cited by 8
50 most cited of 160 All 160 (JSON)
- 2026Beyond Imitation: A Framework and Benchmark for LLM-Assisted Peer Review8 Oct 2026
- 2026Science or Slop?: Benchmarking and Mitigating Scientific Slop in AI-Generated Papers30 Sep 2026
- 2026Policy-Conditioned AI-Use Detection: An Evidentiary Framework for Academic Publishing29 Sep 2026
- 2026Judging a Review by its Cover: A Reliability Analysis of LLM-based Peer Review Evaluation Metrics20 Sep 2026
- 2026The evolution of sex for artificial intelligence: a population-genetic framework for multigenerational model populations16 Sep 2026
- 2026NovGauge: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Diagnosing LLMs' Capability in Paper Novelty Assessment10 Sep 2026
- 2026Do Reviewers Still Reward Lexical Complexity? A Frozen-Rater Study of Preference Drift in 124K ICLR Reviews8 Sep 2026
- 2026The Emerging AI Paper-Review Arms Race: Adversarial Co-Evolution in Scholarly Publishing7 Sep 2026
- 2026Where Should Language Sit in a Multimodal Model? Lessons from What Language Does to Human Perception and Cognition7 Sep 2026
- 2026CABAL: Multi-Agent Simulacra for Tracing the Effects of Collusive Bidding in Peer Review4 Sep 2026
- 2026More Criticism Does Not Make a Better Review: EquiReview-R3 Sep 2026
- 2026Value Over Language Model: Detecting Original Contribution in Writing1 Sep 2026
38 more
- 2026Linear Probing Provides Robust and Efficient Detection of Machine-Generated Text25 Aug 2026
- 2026Tree-of-Concerns: Hierarchical Multi-Agent Debate for Unstated-Limitation Extraction in Scientific Critique21 Aug 2026
- 2026Metag: A dataset to build agentic meta-reviewing capabilities20 Aug 2026
- 2026Asymmetric Discourse Homogenization and Shared Language Technology: Evidence from Reddit13 Aug 2026
- 2026Most biomedical publications show signs of LLM-assisted writing11 Aug 2026
- 2026The em-dash em-beds in Congress: A population-level rise in em-dash frequency in U.S. congressional press releases at the dawn of the large-language-model era, 2021-20256 Aug 2026
- 2026AI-Assisted Peer Review Across Research Communities: From Reviewer AI Policies to LLM Review Quality4 Aug 2026
- 2026When AI Writes, Who Gets Cited? Evidence of Citation Monoculture Across Language Models3 Aug 2026
- 2026Do large language models scrutinise what they review? A multimodal audit of scoring calibration, error detection, and author-identity effects31 Jul 2026
- 2026Artificial Epanorthosis: Why large language models overuse a classical rhetorical figure, and how to mitigate it23 Jul 2026
- 2026Scientific exploration, collaboration and labor division in the large language model era23 Jul 2026
- 2026The Aura in the Machine: Genealogy and the Status of the Work of Art in the Generative Era20 Jul 2026
- 2026The Hitchhiker's Guide to Monoculture: AI Homogenizes Syntax, Not (Necessarily) Semantics12 Jul 2026
- 2026An Exploratory Study on LLM-Generated Code and Comments in Code Repositories2 Jul 2026
- 2026Em-ergence of the em-dash: a population-level rise in em-dash frequency in medRxiv preprints at the dawn of the large-language-model era28 Jun 2026
- 2026Hitting a Moving Target: Test-Time Adaptation for AI Text Detection under Continual Distribution Shift23 Jun 2026
- 2026Intelligence Is Not the Bottleneck: Validating an LLM First-Pass Manuscript Score Against Peer-Review Outcomes14 Jun 2026
- 2026No Hidden Prompts Needed! You Can Game AI Peer Review with Presentation-Only Revisions11 Jun 2026
- 2026Gaming AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Poses New Risks to the Scientific Community8 Jun 2026
- 2026The Ghost Couple: Correlated LLM Name Priors and Their Haunting of the Web and Academic Publishing1 Jun 2026
- 2026Review Arcade: On the Human Alignment and Gameability of LLM Reviews27 May 2026
- 2026DeepSciVerify: Verifying Scientific Claim--Citation Alignment via LLM-Driven Evidence Escalation26 May 2026
- 2026E3: Issue-Level Backtesting for Automated Research Critique26 May 2026
- 2026LLM-as-a-Reviewer: Benchmarking Their Ability, Divergence, and Prompt Injection Resistance as Paper Reviewers25 May 2026
- 2026Sem-Detect: Semantic Level Detection of AI Generated Peer-Reviews20 May 2026
- 2026AiraXiv: An AI-Driven Open-Access Platform for Human and AI Scientists20 May 2026
- 2026Self-Training Doesn't Flatten Language -- It Restructures It: Surface Markers Amplify While Deep Syntax Dies20 May 2026
- 2026To Trust or Not to Trust: Authors' Response to AI-based Reviews15 May 2026
- 2026When Reviews Disagree: Fine-Grained Contradiction Analysis in Scientific Peer Reviews11 May 2026
- 2026On Seeding Watermarks to Detect Verbatim LLM Copy-Paste Responses7 May 2026
- 2026MELD: Multi-Task Equilibrated Learning Detector for AI-Generated Text7 May 2026
- 2026Stop Automating Peer Review Without Rigorous Evaluation4 May 2026
- 2026Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future30 Apr 2026
- 2026A Faceted Proposal for Transparent Attribution of AI-Assisted Text Production28 Apr 2026
- 2026When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee?26 Apr 2026
- 2026Smaller, Younger, and More Impactful: How AI-Assisted Writing Transforms Research Teams24 Apr 2026
- 2026Rethinking Publication: A Certification Framework for AI-Enabled Research23 Apr 2026
- 2026What Makes a Good AI Review? Concern-Level Diagnostics for AI Peer Review21 Apr 2026
50 newest of 160 All 160 (JSON)
- 2024AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM Agentscited by 92
- 2024Game-theoretic LLM: Agent Workflow for Negotiation Gamescited by 55
- 2025BadScientist: Can a Research Agent Write Convincing but Unsound Papers that Fool LLM Reviewers?cited by 8
- 2025EMAC+: Embodied Multimodal Agent for Collaborative Planning with VLM+LLMcited by 5
- 2026OpenNovelty: An LLM-powered Agentic System for Verifiable Scholarly Novelty Assessmentcited by 4
- 2026Social Simulacra in the Wild: AI Agent Communities on Moltbookcited by 4
- 2025A Multi-Agent Perspective on Modern Information Retrievalcited by 2
- 2026APRES: An Agentic Paper Revision and Evaluation Systemcited by 1
- 2026CABAL: Multi-Agent Simulacra for Tracing the Effects of Collusive Bidding in Peer Reviewcited by 1
- 2026The Emerging AI Paper-Review Arms Race: Adversarial Co-Evolution in Scholarly Publishingcited by 1
- 2026Metag: A dataset to build agentic meta-reviewing capabilitiescited by 0
- 2026Tree-of-Concerns: Hierarchical Multi-Agent Debate for Unstated-Limitation Extraction in Scientific Critiquecited by 0
- 2026The Emerging AI Paper-Review Arms Race: Adversarial Co-Evolution in Scholarly Publishing7 Sep 2026
- 2026CABAL: Multi-Agent Simulacra for Tracing the Effects of Collusive Bidding in Peer Review4 Sep 2026
- 2026Tree-of-Concerns: Hierarchical Multi-Agent Debate for Unstated-Limitation Extraction in Scientific Critique21 Aug 2026
- 2026Metag: A dataset to build agentic meta-reviewing capabilities20 Aug 2026
- 2026Social Simulacra in the Wild: AI Agent Communities on Moltbook17 Mar 2026
- 2026APRES: An Agentic Paper Revision and Evaluation System3 Mar 2026
- 2026OpenNovelty: An LLM-powered Agentic System for Verifiable Scholarly Novelty Assessment4 Jan 2026
- 2025BadScientist: Can a Research Agent Write Convincing but Unsound Papers that Fool LLM Reviewers?20 Oct 2025
- 2025EMAC+: Embodied Multimodal Agent for Collaborative Planning with VLM+LLM26 May 2025
- 2025A Multi-Agent Perspective on Modern Information Retrieval20 Feb 2025
- 2024Game-theoretic LLM: Agent Workflow for Negotiation Games8 Nov 2024
- 2024AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM Agents18 Jun 2024
- 2025Detecting LLM-Generated Peer Reviewscited by 18
- 2025In-Context Watermarks for Large Language Modelscited by 9
- 2026Stateless Yet Not Forgetful: Implicit Memory as a Hidden Channel in LLMscited by 3
- 2024Watermarking Large Language Models and the Generated Content: Opportunities and Challengescited by 2
- 2026LLM-as-a-Reviewer: Benchmarking Their Ability, Divergence, and Prompt Injection Resistance as Paper Reviewerscited by 2
- 2026No Hidden Prompts Needed! You Can Game AI Peer Review with Presentation-Only Revisionscited by 1
- 2026On Seeding Watermarks to Detect Verbatim LLM Copy-Paste Responsescited by 0
- 2026No Hidden Prompts Needed! You Can Game AI Peer Review with Presentation-Only Revisions11 Jun 2026
- 2026LLM-as-a-Reviewer: Benchmarking Their Ability, Divergence, and Prompt Injection Resistance as Paper Reviewers25 May 2026
- 2026On Seeding Watermarks to Detect Verbatim LLM Copy-Paste Responses7 May 2026
- 2026Stateless Yet Not Forgetful: Implicit Memory as a Hidden Channel in LLMs9 Feb 2026
- 2025In-Context Watermarks for Large Language Models22 May 2025
- 2025Detecting LLM-Generated Peer Reviews20 Mar 2025
- 2024Watermarking Large Language Models and the Generated Content: Opportunities and Challenges24 Oct 2024
- 2024Is A Picture Worth A Thousand Words? Delving Into Spatial Reasoning for Vision Language Modelscited by 111
- 2025DeepReview: Improving LLM-based Paper Review with Human-like Deep Thinking Processcited by 97
- 2024System 2 thinking in OpenAI's o1-preview model: Near-perfect performance on a mathematics examcited by 10
- 2025Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation Frameworkcited by 10
- 2025LLMs, Reasoning and Plagiarismcited by 2
- 2025LLMs, Reasoning and Plagiarism18 Dec 2025
- 2025Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation Framework29 Aug 2025
- 2025DeepReview: Improving LLM-based Paper Review with Human-like Deep Thinking Process11 Mar 2025
- 2024System 2 thinking in OpenAI's o1-preview model: Near-perfect performance on a mathematics exam19 Sep 2024
- 2024Is A Picture Worth A Thousand Words? Delving Into Spatial Reasoning for Vision Language Models21 Jun 2024
- 2024On the Algorithmic Bias of Aligning Large Language Models with RLHF: Preference Collapse and Matching Regularizationcited by 72
- 2024Why Does ChatGPT "Delve" So Much? Exploring the Sources of Lexical Overrepresentation in Large Language Modelscited by 8
- 2025Poor Alignment and Steerability of Large Language Models: Evidence from College Admission Essayscited by 6
- 2026Do Reviewers Still Reward Lexical Complexity? A Frozen-Rater Study of Preference Drift in 124K ICLR Reviewscited by 0
- 2026Do Reviewers Still Reward Lexical Complexity? A Frozen-Rater Study of Preference Drift in 124K ICLR Reviews8 Sep 2026
- 2025Poor Alignment and Steerability of Large Language Models: Evidence from College Admission Essays25 Mar 2025
- 2024Why Does ChatGPT "Delve" So Much? Exploring the Sources of Lexical Overrepresentation in Large Language Models16 Dec 2024
- 2024On the Algorithmic Bias of Aligning Large Language Models with RLHF: Preference Collapse and Matching Regularization26 May 2024
- 2024Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Paperscited by 112
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Scientific Large Language Models and Their Applications in Scientific Discoverycited by 96
- 2024Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabularycited by 75
- 2024Do LLMs write like humans? Variation in grammatical and rhetorical stylescited by 62
- 2025Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A surveycited by 59
- 2025The Widespread Adoption of Large Language Model-Assisted Writing Across Societycited by 50
- 2024Detection and Measurement of Syntactic Templates in Generated Textcited by 44
- 2025Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025cited by 40
- 2025Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewardscited by 34
- 2024Conv-Basis: A New Paradigm for Efficient Attention Inference and Gradient Computation in Transformerscited by 32
- 2024Training Tensor Attention Efficiently: From Cubic to Almost Linear Timecited by 29
- 2024Is ChatGPT Transforming Academics' Writing Style?cited by 26
12 most cited of 129 All 129 (JSON)
- 2026Beyond Imitation: A Framework and Benchmark for LLM-Assisted Peer Review8 Oct 2026
- 2026Science or Slop?: Benchmarking and Mitigating Scientific Slop in AI-Generated Papers30 Sep 2026
- 2026Policy-Conditioned AI-Use Detection: An Evidentiary Framework for Academic Publishing29 Sep 2026
- 2026Judging a Review by its Cover: A Reliability Analysis of LLM-based Peer Review Evaluation Metrics20 Sep 2026
- 2026The evolution of sex for artificial intelligence: a population-genetic framework for multigenerational model populations16 Sep 2026
- 2026NovGauge: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Diagnosing LLMs' Capability in Paper Novelty Assessment10 Sep 2026
- 2026Where Should Language Sit in a Multimodal Model? Lessons from What Language Does to Human Perception and Cognition7 Sep 2026
- 2026More Criticism Does Not Make a Better Review: EquiReview-R3 Sep 2026
- 2026Value Over Language Model: Detecting Original Contribution in Writing1 Sep 2026
- 2026Linear Probing Provides Robust and Efficient Detection of Machine-Generated Text25 Aug 2026
- 2026Asymmetric Discourse Homogenization and Shared Language Technology: Evidence from Reddit13 Aug 2026
- 2026Most biomedical publications show signs of LLM-assisted writing11 Aug 2026
12 newest of 129 All 129 (JSON)