mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Simple yet Efficient Ensemble Approach for AI-generated Text Detection

arXiv 2311.03084 ↗First posted 6 Nov 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in generating text that closely resembles human writing across wide range of styles and genres. However, such capabilities are prone to potential abuse, such as fake news generation, spam email creation, and misuse in academic assignments. Hence, it is essential to build automated approaches capable of distinguishing between artificially generated text and human-authored text. In this paper, we propose a simple yet efficient solution to this problem by ensembling predictions from multiple constituent LLMs. Compared to previous state-of-the-art approaches, which are perplexity-based or uses ensembles with a number of LLMs, our condensed ensembling approach uses only two constituent LLMs to achieve comparable performance. Experiments conducted on four benchmark datasets for generative text classification show performance improvements in the range of 0.5 to 100% compared to previous state-of-the-art approaches. We also study the influence that the training data from individual LLMs have on model performance. We found that substituting commercially-restrictive Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) data with data generated from other open language models such as Falcon, Large Language Model Meta AI (LLaMA2), and Mosaic Pretrained Transformers (MPT) is a feasible alternative when developing generative text detectors. Furthermore, to demonstrate zero-shot generalization, we experimented with an English essays dataset, and results suggest that our ensembling approach can handle new data effectively.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2023.

Builds on

21 of 36 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  5. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  6. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
  7. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
  8. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
  9. 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
  10. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  11. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
  12. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
9 more
  1. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 372
  2. 2023GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writerscited by 175
  3. 2023DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Textcited by 127
  4. 2021TURINGBENCH: A Benchmark Environment for Turing Test in the Age of Neural Text Generationcited by 118
  5. 2023MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 90
  6. 2022CoCo: Coherence-Enhanced Machine-Generated Text Detection Under Data Limitation With Contrastive Learningcited by 32
  7. 2023Generative AI Text Classification using Ensemble LLM Approachescited by 29
  8. 2023Domain Adaptive Code Completion via Language Models and Decoupled Domain Databasescited by 19
  9. 2022A Benchmark Corpus for the Detection of Automatically Generated Text in Academic Publicationscited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 7; 2026: 2.

12 papers.