mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Human Texts Are Outliers: Detecting LLM-generated Texts via Out-of-distribution Detection

arXiv 2510.08602 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2025cs.CL cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and Claude has significantly increased the presence of AI-generated text in digital communication. This trend has heightened the need for reliable detection methods to distinguish between human-authored and machine-generated content. Existing approaches both zero-shot methods and supervised classifiers largely conceptualize this task as a binary classification problem, often leading to poor generalization across domains and models. In this paper, we argue that such a binary formulation fundamentally mischaracterizes the detection task by assuming a coherent representation of human-written texts. In reality, human texts do not constitute a unified distribution, and their diversity cannot be effectively captured through limited sampling. This causes previous classifiers to memorize observed OOD characteristics rather than learn the essence of `non-ID' behavior, limiting generalization to unseen human-authored inputs. Based on this observation, we propose reframing the detection task as an out-of-distribution (OOD) detection problem, treating human-written texts as distributional outliers while machine-generated texts are in-distribution (ID) samples. To this end, we develop a detection framework using one-class learning method including DeepSVDD and HRN, and score-based learning techniques such as energy-based method, enabling robust and generalizable performance. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets validate the effectiveness of our OOD-based approach. Specifically, the OOD-based method achieves 98.3% AUROC and AUPR with only 8.9% FPR95 on DeepFake dataset. Moreover, we test our detection framework on multilingual, attacked, and unseen-model and -domain text settings, demonstrating the robustness and generalizability of our framework. Code, pretrained weights, and demo will be released.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 61 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2025.

Builds on

61 of 83 references.

References · 61

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  4. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
  5. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
  6. 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,485
  7. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,328
  8. 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,299
  9. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
  10. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 725
  11. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
  12. 2019Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 453
38 more
  1. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 429
  2. 2020Generalized ODIN: Detecting Out-of-distribution Image without Learning from Out-of-distribution Datacited by 408
  3. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 386
  4. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 287
  5. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 263
  6. 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 261
  7. 2018Learning Confidence for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Neural Networkscited by 245
  8. 2023Undetectable Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 226
  9. 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 210
  10. 2018WikiHow: A Large Scale Text Summarization Datasetcited by 204
  11. 2018Adversarially Learned One-Class Classifier for Novelty Detectioncited by 202
  12. 2019OCGAN: One-class Novelty Detection Using GANs with Constrained Latent Representationscited by 199
  13. 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 190
  14. 2021Anomaly Detection on Attributed Networks via Contrastive Self-Supervised Learningcited by 177
  15. 2024RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 163
  16. 2018A Dataset of Peer Reviews (PeerRead): Collection, Insights and NLP Applicationscited by 136
  17. 2023The Troubling Emergence of Hallucination in Large Language Models -- An Extensive Definition, Quantification, and Prescriptive Remediationscited by 131
  18. 2020Adversarial Watermarking Transformer: Towards Tracing Text Provenance with Data Hidingcited by 130
  19. 2023DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Textcited by 129
  20. 2023M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 121
  21. 2020ATOM: Robustifying Out-of-distribution Detection Using Outlier Miningcited by 116
  22. 2023Intrinsic Dimension Estimation for Robust Detection of AI-Generated Textscited by 112
  23. 2023Ghostbuster: Detecting Text Ghostwritten by Large Language Modelscited by 91
  24. 2023On the Possibilities of AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 88
  25. 2018Anomaly Detection using One-Class Neural Networkscited by 82
  26. 2023Robust Multi-bit Natural Language Watermarking through Invariant Featurescited by 82
  27. 2022Do Language Models Plagiarize?cited by 73
  28. 2023A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Contentcited by 71
  29. 2023SeqXGPT: Sentence-Level AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 56
  30. 2024DeTeCtive: Detecting AI-generated Text via Multi-Level Contrastive Learningcited by 53
  31. 2019Generating Sentiment-Preserving Fake Online Reviews Using Neural Language Models and Their Human- and Machine-based Detectioncited by 52
  32. 2024Raidar: geneRative AI Detection viA Rewritingcited by 52
  33. 2023GPT-Sentinel: Distinguishing Human and ChatGPT Generated Contentcited by 43
  34. 2023Origin Tracing and Detecting of LLMscited by 40
  35. 2023GPT-who: An Information Density-based Machine-Generated Text Detectorcited by 40
  36. 2023Smaller Language Models are Better Black-box Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 35
  37. 2022CoCo: Coherence-Enhanced Machine-Generated Text Detection Under Data Limitation With Contrastive Learningcited by 33
  38. 2023A Survey on Out-of-Distribution Detection in NLPcited by 31

50 most cited of 61 All 61 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 7.

8 papers.