mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Detection of Fake Generated Scientific Abstracts

arXiv 2304.06148 ↗First posted 12 Apr 2023cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The widespread adoption of Large Language Models and publicly available ChatGPT has marked a significant turning point in the integration of Artificial Intelligence into people's everyday lives. The academic community has taken notice of these technological advancements and has expressed concerns regarding the difficulty of discriminating between what is real and what is artificially generated. Thus, researchers have been working on developing effective systems to identify machine-generated text. In this study, we utilize the GPT-3 model to generate scientific paper abstracts through Artificial Intelligence and explore various text representation methods when combined with Machine Learning models with the aim of identifying machine-written text. We analyze the models' performance and address several research questions that rise during the analysis of the results. By conducting this research, we shed light on the capabilities and limitations of Artificial Intelligence generated text.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2023.

Builds on

17 of 30 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  4. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
  5. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  6. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
  7. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
  8. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
  9. 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 260
  10. 2019ScispaCy: Fast and Robust Models for Biomedical Natural Language Processingcited by 244
  11. 2020CORD-19: The COVID-19 Open Research Datasetcited by 179
  12. 2020Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Surveycited by 160
5 more
  1. 2014word2vec Explained: deriving Mikolov et al.'s negative-sampling word-embedding methodcited by 109
  2. 2022Machine Generated Text: A Comprehensive Survey of Threat Models and Detection Methodscited by 75
  3. 2020Neural Deepfake Detection with Factual Structure of Textcited by 40
  4. 2022CoCo: Coherence-Enhanced Machine-Generated Text Detection Under Data Limitation With Contrastive Learningcited by 32
  5. 2023AI vs. Human -- Differentiation Analysis of Scientific Content Generationcited by 21

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

3 papers.