mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the importance of data collection for training general goal-reaching policies

arXiv 2211.03521 ↗First posted 7 Nov 2022cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in ML suggest that the quantity of data available to a model is one of the primary bottlenecks to high performance. Although for language-based tasks there exist almost unlimited amounts of reasonably coherent data to train from, this is generally not the case for Reinforcement Learning, especially when dealing with a novel environment. In effect, even a relatively trivial continuous environment has an almost limitless number of states, but simply sampling random states and actions will likely not provide transitions that are interesting or useful for any potential downstream task. How should one generate massive amounts of useful data given only an MDP with no indication of downstream tasks? Are the quantity and quality of data truly transformative to the performance of a general controller? We propose to answer both of these questions. First, we introduce a principled unsupervised exploration method, ChronoGEM, which aims to achieve uniform coverage over the manifold of achievable states, which we believe is the most reasonable goal given no prior task information. Secondly, we investigate the effects of both data quantity and data quality on the training of a downstream goal-achievement policy, and show that both large quantities and high-quality of data are essential to train a general controller: a high-precision pose-achievement policy capable of attaining a large number of poses over numerous continuous control embodiments including humanoid.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2022.

Builds on

37 of 46 references.

References · 37

  1. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  3. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
  4. 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,427
  5. 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,136
  6. 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,103
  7. 2018Exploration by Random Network Distillationcited by 993
  8. 2018Diversity is All You Need: Learning Skills without a Reward Functioncited by 752
  9. 2017Masked Autoregressive Flow for Density Estimationcited by 684
  10. 2016Unifying Count-Based Exploration and Intrinsic Motivationcited by 639
  11. 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 596
  12. 2021Brax -- A Differentiable Physics Engine for Large Scale Rigid Body Simulationcited by 407
25 more
  1. 2020Planning to Explore via Self-Supervised World Modelscited by 368
  2. 2018Sim-to-Real: Learning Agile Locomotion For Quadruped Robotscited by 319
  3. 2020Data-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Self-Predictive Representationscited by 318
  4. 2015MADE: Masked Autoencoder for Distribution Estimationcited by 307
  5. 2020First return, then explorecited by 266
  6. 2017Count-Based Exploration with Neural Density Modelscited by 257
  7. 2018Provably Efficient Maximum Entropy Explorationcited by 242
  8. 2019Go-Explore: a New Approach for Hard-Exploration Problemscited by 212
  9. 2020Never Give Up: Learning Directed Exploration Strategiescited by 212
  10. 2019Efficient Exploration via State Marginal Matchingcited by 188
  11. 2021Behavior From the Void: Unsupervised Active Pre-Trainingcited by 174
  12. 2020RIDE: Rewarding Impact-Driven Exploration for Procedurally-Generated Environmentscited by 135
  13. 2021Discovering and Achieving Goals via World Modelscited by 131
  14. 2021APS: Active Pretraining with Successor Featurescited by 112
  15. 2020Maximum Entropy Gain Exploration for Long Horizon Multi-goal Reinforcement Learningcited by 102
  16. 2022BYOL-Explore: Exploration by Bootstrapped Predictioncited by 73
  17. 2021Asymmetric self-play for automatic goal discovery in robotic manipulationcited by 72
  18. 2021Legged Robots that Keep on Learning: Fine-Tuning Locomotion Policies in the Real Worldcited by 71
  19. 2013RNADE: The real-valued neural autoregressive density-estimatorcited by 66
  20. 2021Concave Utility Reinforcement Learning: the Mean-Field Game Viewpointcited by 56
  21. 2019Autonomous Penetration Testing using Reinforcement Learningcited by 33
  22. 2021Geometric Entropic Explorationcited by 32
  23. 2021Direct Behavior Specification via Constrained Reinforcement Learningcited by 31
  24. 2021Direct then Diffuse: Incremental Unsupervised Skill Discovery for State Covering and Goal Reachingcited by 19
  25. 2018Deep Reinforcement Fuzzingcited by 14

Built on by

Not cited yet.