mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Is Face Recognition Sexist? No, Gendered Hairstyles and Biology Are

arXiv 2008.06989 ↗First posted 16 Aug 2020cs.CVcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent news articles have accused face recognition of being "biased", "sexist" or "racist". There is consensus in the research literature that face recognition accuracy is lower for females, who often have both a higher false match rate and a higher false non-match rate. However, there is little published research aimed at identifying the cause of lower accuracy for females. For instance, the 2019 Face Recognition Vendor Test that documents lower female accuracy across a broad range of algorithms and datasets also lists "Analyze cause and effect" under the heading "What we did not do". We present the first experimental analysis to identify major causes of lower face recognition accuracy for females on datasets where previous research has observed this result. Controlling for equal amount of visible face in the test images reverses the apparent higher false non-match rate for females. Also, principal component analysis indicates that images of two different females are inherently more similar than of two different males, potentially accounting for a difference in false match rates.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 4; 2023: 6; 2024: 4; 2025: 2.

23 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021A Comprehensive Study on Face Recognition Biases Beyond Demographicscited by 86
  2. 2021PASS: Protected Attribute Suppression System for Mitigating Bias in Face Recognitioncited by 38
  3. 2021Gendered Differences in Face Recognition Accuracy Explained by Hairstyles, Makeup, and Facial Morphologycited by 32
  4. 2022Face Recognition Accuracy Across Demographics: Shining a Light Into the Problemcited by 24
  5. 2022The Gender Gap in Face Recognition Accuracy Is a Hairy Problemcited by 15
  6. 2023Towards Fair Face Verification: An In-depth Analysis of Demographic Biasescited by 14
  7. 2023What Should Be Balanced in a "Balanced" Face Recognition Dataset?cited by 13
  8. 2023Bias and Diversity in Synthetic-based Face Recognitioncited by 11
  9. 2021Distill and De-bias: Mitigating Bias in Face Verification using Knowledge Distillationcited by 6
  10. 2022Explaining Bias in Deep Face Recognition via Image Characteristicscited by 6
  11. 2021Improving Face Recognition with Large Age Gaps by Learning to Distinguish Childrencited by 5
  12. 2023Beard Segmentation and Recognition Biascited by 5
11 more
  1. 2023Impact of Blur and Resolution on Demographic Disparities in 1-to-Many Facial Identificationcited by 5
  2. 2021Does Face Recognition Error Echo Gender Classification Error?cited by 4
  3. 2024Model Compression Techniques in Biometrics Applications: A Surveycited by 4
  4. 2024Score Normalization for Demographic Fairness in Face Recognitioncited by 4
  5. 2024The Impact of Balancing Real and Synthetic Data on Accuracy and Fairness in Face Recognitioncited by 3
  6. 2022The More Secure, The Less Equally Usable: Gender and Ethnicity (Un)fairness of Deep Face Recognition along Security Thresholdscited by 2
  7. 2024MST-KD: Multiple Specialized Teachers Knowledge Distillation for Fair Face Recognitioncited by 2
  8. 2025On the Illusion of Gender Bias in Face Recognition: Explaining the Fairness Issue Through Non-demographic Attributescited by 2
  9. 2021Demographic Fairness in Face Identification: The Watchlist Imbalance Effectcited by 1
  10. 2023(Un)fair Exposure in Deep Face Rankings at a Distancecited by 1
  11. 2025A Critical Review of Predominant Bias in Neural Networkscited by 0