Can the accuracy bias by facial hairstyle be reduced through balancing the training data?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Appearance of a face can be greatly altered by growing a beard and mustache. The facial hairstyles in a pair of images can cause marked changes to the impostor distribution and the genuine distribution. Also, different distributions of facial hairstyle across demographics could cause a false impression of relative accuracy across demographics. We first show that, even though larger training sets boost the recognition accuracy on all facial hairstyles, accuracy variations caused by facial hairstyles persist regardless of the size of the training set. Then, we analyze the impact of having different fractions of the training data represent facial hairstyles. We created balanced training sets using a set of identities available in Webface42M that both have clean-shaven and facial hair images. We find that, even when a face recognition model is trained with a balanced clean-shaven / facial hair training set, accuracy variation on the test data does not diminish. Next, data augmentation is employed to further investigate the effect of facial hair distribution in training data by manipulating facial hair pixels with the help of facial landmark points and a facial hair segmentation model. Our results show facial hair causes an accuracy gap between clean-shaven and facial hair images, and this impact can be significantly different between African-Americans and Caucasians.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2024.
Builds on
38 of 51 references.
References · 38
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
- 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,239
- 2018CosFace: Large Margin Cosine Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 971
- 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 655
- 2018BiSeNet: Bilateral Segmentation Network for Real-time Semantic Segmentationcited by 645
- 2017How far are we from solving the 2D & 3D Face Alignment problem? (and a dataset of 230,000 3D facial landmarks)cited by 525
- 2014Learning Face Representation from Scratchcited by 453
- 2022AdaFace: Quality Adaptive Margin for Face Recognitioncited by 391
- 2021MagFace: A Universal Representation for Face Recognition and Quality Assessmentcited by 334
26 more
- 2019Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biasescited by 280
- 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
- 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
- 2021WebFace260M: A Benchmark Unveiling the Power of Million-Scale Deep Face Recognitioncited by 223
- 2018Training behavior of deep neural network in frequency domaincited by 174
- 2019Towards Understanding the Spectral Bias of Deep Learningcited by 174
- 2020Demographic Bias in Biometrics: A Survey on an Emerging Challengecited by 93
- 2021A Comprehensive Study on Face Recognition Biases Beyond Demographicscited by 86
- 2021A Survey on Bias in Visual Datasetscited by 84
- 2020Face Recognition: Too Bias, or Not Too Bias?cited by 82
- 2019Accuracy comparison across face recognition algorithms: Where are we on measuring race bias?cited by 56
- 2020Fairness in Biometrics: a figure of merit to assess biometric verification systemscited by 41
- 2021Consistent Instance False Positive Improves Fairness in Face Recognitioncited by 40
- 2021Biometrics: Trust, but Verifycited by 39
- 2020How Does Gender Balance In Training Data Affect Face Recognition Accuracy?cited by 37
- 2020InsideBias: Measuring Bias in Deep Networks and Application to Face Gender Biometricscited by 31
- 2018An Experimental Evaluation of Covariates Effects on Unconstrained Face Verificationcited by 28
- 2022Face Recognition Accuracy Across Demographics: Shining a Light Into the Problemcited by 25
- 2021Anatomizing Bias in Facial Analysiscited by 18
- 2021Balancing Biases and Preserving Privacy on Balanced Faces in the Wildcited by 17
- 2021Measuring Hidden Bias within Face Recognition via Racial Phenotypescited by 16
- 2022The Gender Gap in Face Recognition Accuracy Is a Hairy Problemcited by 15
- 2023Logical Consistency and Greater Descriptive Power for Facial Hair Attribute Learningcited by 15
- 2023What Should Be Balanced in a "Balanced" Face Recognition Dataset?cited by 13
- 2023Compressed Models Decompress Race Biases: What Quantized Models Forget for Fair Face Recognitioncited by 9
- 2023Beard Segmentation and Recognition Biascited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024FRoundation: Are Foundation Models Ready for Face Recognition?cited by 23
- 2025Review of Demographic Fairness in Face Recognitioncited by 7
- 2025Lights, Camera, Matching: The Role of Image Illumination in Fair Face Recognitioncited by 3
- 2025Vec2Face+ for Face Dataset Generationcited by 1
- 2026Revisiting Face Recognition for Monozygotic Twins: The Celeb Twins Test Setcited by 0
- 2026Revisiting Face Recognition for Monozygotic Twins: The Celeb Twins Test Set1 Sep 2026
- 2025Vec2Face+ for Face Dataset Generation23 Jul 2025
- 2025Review of Demographic Fairness in Face Recognition4 Feb 2025
- 2025Lights, Camera, Matching: The Role of Image Illumination in Fair Face Recognition15 Jan 2025
- 2024FRoundation: Are Foundation Models Ready for Face Recognition?31 Oct 2024