mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Does Face Recognition Accuracy Get Better With Age? Deep Face Matchers Say No

arXiv 1911.06396 ↗First posted 14 Nov 2019cs.CVcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Previous studies generally agree that face recognition accuracy is higher for older persons than for younger persons. But most previous studies were before the wave of deep learning matchers, and most considered accuracy only in terms of the verification rate for genuine pairs. This paper investigates accuracy for age groups 16-29, 30-49 and 50-70, using three modern deep CNN matchers, and considers differences in the impostor and genuine distributions as well as verification rates and ROC curves. We find that accuracy is lower for older persons and higher for younger persons. In contrast, a pre deep learning matcher on the same dataset shows the traditional result of higher accuracy for older persons, although its overall accuracy is much lower than that of the deep learning matchers. Comparing the impostor and genuine distributions, we conclude that impostor scores have a larger effect than genuine scores in causing lower accuracy for the older age group. We also investigate the effects of training data across the age groups. Our results show that fine-tuning the deep CNN models on additional images of older persons actually lowers accuracy for the older age group. Also, we fine-tune and train from scratch two models using age-balanced training datasets, and these results also show lower accuracy for older age group. These results argue that the lower accuracy for the older age group is not due to imbalance in the original training data.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 2.

16 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Towards Fair Federated Learning with Zero-Shot Data Augmentationcited by 64
  2. 2021Gendered Differences in Face Recognition Accuracy Explained by Hairstyles, Makeup, and Facial Morphologycited by 32
  3. 2024AI-Face: A Million-Scale Demographically Annotated AI-Generated Face Dataset and Fairness Benchmarkcited by 28
  4. 2022The Gender Gap in Face Recognition Accuracy Is a Hairy Problemcited by 15
  5. 2023Logical Consistency and Greater Descriptive Power for Facial Hair Attribute Learningcited by 15
  6. 2023What Should Be Balanced in a "Balanced" Face Recognition Dataset?cited by 13
  7. 2024Synthetic Data for the Mitigation of Demographic Biases in Face Recognitioncited by 10
  8. 2025Review of Demographic Fairness in Face Recognitioncited by 7
  9. 2022Casual Conversations v2: Designing a large consent-driven dataset to measure algorithmic bias and robustnesscited by 5
  10. 2023Impact of Blur and Resolution on Demographic Disparities in 1-to-Many Facial Identificationcited by 5
  11. 2021Does Face Recognition Error Echo Gender Classification Error?cited by 4
  12. 2023The Casual Conversations v2 Datasetcited by 4
4 more
  1. 2024Synthetic Face Ageing: Evaluation, Analysis and Facilitation of Age-Robust Facial Recognition Algorithmscited by 3
  2. 2024CounterFace: A Synthetic Face Dataset for Fine-Grained Counterfactual Evaluation of Face Recognition Systemscited by 2
  3. 2021Evaluation of Human and Machine Face Detection using a Novel Distinctive Human Appearance Datasetcited by 1
  4. 2025A Rapid Test for Accuracy and Bias of Face Recognition Technologycited by 1