mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Characterization of Multiclass Learnability

arXiv 2203.01550 ↗First posted 3 Mar 2022cs.LG math.ST stat.THcited by 66

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A seminal result in learning theory characterizes the PAC learnability of binary classes through the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension. Extending this characterization to the general multiclass setting has been open since the pioneering works on multiclass PAC learning in the late 1980s. This work resolves this problem: we characterize multiclass PAC learnability through the DS dimension, a combinatorial dimension defined by Daniely and Shalev-Shwartz (2014). The classical characterization of the binary case boils down to empirical risk minimization. In contrast, our characterization of the multiclass case involves a variety of algorithmic ideas; these include a natural setting we call list PAC learning. In the list learning setting, instead of predicting a single outcome for a given unseen input, the goal is to provide a short menu of predictions. Our second main result concerns the Natarajan dimension, which has been a central candidate for characterizing multiclass learnability. This dimension was introduced by Natarajan (1988) as a barrier for PAC learning. Whether the Natarajan dimension characterizes PAC learnability in general has been posed as an open question in several papers since. This work provides a negative answer: we construct a non-learnable class with Natarajan dimension one. For the construction, we identify a fundamental connection between concept classes and topology (i.e., colorful simplicial complexes). We crucially rely on a deep and involved construction of hyperbolic pseudo-manifolds by Januszkiewicz and Swiatkowski. It is interesting that hyperbolicity is directly related to learning problems that are difficult to solve although no obvious barriers exist. This is another demonstration of the fruitful links machine learning has with different areas in mathematics.

Key facts. Cited by 66 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2022.

Builds on

3 of 29 references.

References · 3

  1. 2014Optimal Learners for Multiclass Problemscited by 65
  2. 2021A Theory of PAC Learnability of Partial Concept Classescited by 59
  3. 2014Inapproximability of Truthful Mechanisms via Generalizations of the VC Dimensioncited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 6; 2023: 16; 2024: 12; 2025: 12; 2026: 20.

66 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Optimal PAC Bounds Without Uniform Convergencecited by 33
  2. 2023Optimal Learners for Realizable Regression: PAC Learning and Online Learningcited by 23
  3. 2022A Characterization of List Learnabilitycited by 22
  4. 2023Multiclass Online Learning and Uniform Convergencecited by 19
  5. 2023Optimal Prediction Using Expert Advice and Randomized Littlestone Dimensioncited by 18
  6. 2022Adversarially Robust Learning: A Generic Minimax Optimal Learner and Characterizationcited by 17
  7. 2023List Online Classificationcited by 16
  8. 2023Regularization and Optimal Multiclass Learningcited by 15
  9. 2022Multiclass Learnability Beyond the PAC Framework: Universal Rates and Partial Concept Classescited by 14
  10. 2023A Trichotomy for Transductive Online Learningcited by 13
  11. 2023Multiclass Online Learnability under Bandit Feedbackcited by 12
  12. 2024Information Complexity of Stochastic Convex Optimization: Applications to Generalization and Memorizationcited by 12
38 more
  1. 2022The One-Inclusion Graph Algorithm is not Always Optimalcited by 11
  2. 2023Multiclass Boosting: Simple and Intuitive Weak Learning Criteriacited by 11
  3. 2024List Sample Compression and Uniform Convergencecited by 10
  4. 2025Sample Complexity of Agnostic Multiclass Classification: Natarajan Dimension Strikes Backcited by 9
  5. 2022Comparative Learning: A Sample Complexity Theory for Two Hypothesis Classescited by 8
  6. 2023When is Agnostic Reinforcement Learning Statistically Tractable?cited by 8
  7. 2024Multiclass Transductive Online Learningcited by 8
  8. 2026The Optimal Sample Complexity of Multiclass and List Learningcited by 8
  9. 2023Multiclass Learnability Does Not Imply Sample Compressioncited by 6
  10. 2024Ramsey Theorems for Trees and a General 'Private Learning Implies Online Learning' Theoremcited by 6
  11. 2024A Characterization of List Regressioncited by 6
  12. 2025On Learning Verifiers and Implications to Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 6
  13. 2022Active Learning with Label Comparisonscited by 5
  14. 2023Impossibility of Characterizing Distribution Learning -- a simple solution to a long-standing problemcited by 4
  15. 2024Is Transductive Learning Equivalent to PAC Learning?cited by 4
  16. 2025From Contextual Combinatorial Semi-Bandits to Bandit List Classification: Improved Sample Complexity with Sparse Rewardscited by 4
  17. 2026Learning with Monotone Adversarial Corruptionscited by 4
  18. 2026An Optimal Sauer Lemma Over k-ary Alphabetscited by 4
  19. 2026Tight Generalization Bounds for Noiseless Inverse Optimizationcited by 4
  20. 2023Quantum Learning Theory Beyond Batch Binary Classificationcited by 3
  21. 2024Understanding Aggregations of Proper Learners in Multiclass Classificationcited by 3
  22. 2026Simultaneous Blackwell Approachability and Applications to Multiclass Omnipredictioncited by 3
  23. 2023A Characterization of Multioutput Learnabilitycited by 2
  24. 2023On the Learnability of Multilabel Rankingcited by 2
  25. 2024Approximation Rates and VC-Dimension Bounds for (P)ReLU MLP Mixture of Expertscited by 2
  26. 2024Transductive Learning Is Compactcited by 2
  27. 2024Smoothed Online Classification can be Harder than Batch Classificationcited by 2
  28. 2024Sample Compression Scheme Reductionscited by 2
  29. 2025Proper Learnability and the Role of Unlabeled Datacited by 2
  30. 2025Learning in Structured Stackelberg Gamescited by 2
  31. 2025Private List Learnability vs. Online List Learnabilitycited by 2
  32. 2025On the Hardness of Bandit Learningcited by 2
  33. 2026Local Regularization Does Not Characterize Multiclass PAC Learnabilitycited by 2
  34. 2024The Complexity of Sequential Prediction in Dynamical Systemscited by 1
  35. 2025PAC Learning is just Bipartite Matching (Sort of)cited by 1
  36. 2025On the Computability of Multiclass PAC Learningcited by 1
  37. 2026PAC Learning with Bandit Feedback: Sharp Sample Complexity in the Realizable Settingcited by 1
  38. 2026The Sample Complexity of Multiclass and Sparse Contextual Banditscited by 1

50 most cited of 66 All 66 (JSON)