Transductive Learning Is Compact
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We demonstrate a compactness result holding broadly across supervised learning with a general class of loss functions: Any hypothesis class H is learnable with transductive sample complexity m precisely when all of its finite projections are learnable with sample complexity m. We prove that this exact form of compactness holds for realizable and agnostic learning with respect to any proper metric loss function (e.g., any norm on ℝd) and any continuous loss on a compact space (e.g., cross-entropy, squared loss). For realizable learning with improper metric losses, we show that exact compactness of sample complexity can fail, and provide matching upper and lower bounds of a factor of 2 on the extent to which such sample complexities can differ. We conjecture that larger gaps are possible for the agnostic case. Furthermore, invoking the equivalence between sample complexities in the PAC and transductive models (up to lower order factors, in the realizable case) permits us to directly port our results to the PAC model, revealing an almost-exact form of compactness holding broadly in PAC learning.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2024.
Builds on
11 of 25 references.
References · 11
- 2022A Characterization of Multiclass Learnabilitycited by 66
- 2014Optimal Learners for Multiclass Problemscited by 65
- 2021A Theory of PAC Learnability of Partial Concept Classescited by 59
- 2023When Does Optimizing a Proper Loss Yield Calibration?cited by 35
- 2023Optimal PAC Bounds Without Uniform Convergencecited by 33
- 2023Optimal Learners for Realizable Regression: PAC Learning and Online Learningcited by 23
- 2022Adversarially Robust Learning: A Generic Minimax Optimal Learner and Characterizationcited by 17
- 2023Regularization and Optimal Multiclass Learningcited by 15
- 2023A Trichotomy for Transductive Online Learningcited by 13
- 2022The One-Inclusion Graph Algorithm is not Always Optimalcited by 11
- 2023Impossibility of Characterizing Distribution Learning -- a simple solution to a long-standing problemcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.
- 2025Proper Learnability and the Role of Unlabeled Datacited by 2
- 2025PAC Learning is just Bipartite Matching (Sort of)cited by 1
- 2025Proper Learnability and the Role of Unlabeled Data14 Feb 2025
- 2025PAC Learning is just Bipartite Matching (Sort of)2 Feb 2025