mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Optimistic Rates for Multiclass PAC Learning

arXiv 2608.10869 ↗First posted 11 Aug 2026cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Worst-case multiclass bounds do not become smaller when the best classifier is already nearly correct: what is missing is an optimistic rate, a guarantee whose fluctuation scales with the oracle risk itself. For a class of Natarajan dimension dN and Daniely-Shalev-Shwartz dimension dDS, the optimal excess risk is known at the two endpoints (dDS/n realizable, √dN/n+dDS/n agnostic [HMZ24, CEH+26, Pab26]) and open in between. We close the gap: at every fixed oracle risk L^star, the optimal excess risk is widetildeTheta(√L^star dN/n+dDS/n), uniformly in the alphabet size, attained by a learner that knows neither L^star nor the confidence level. The upper bound composes the cover-menu-compression architecture of [CEH+26], at the realizable rate of [Pab26], with a new comparator-facing relative compression theorem: a size-k compression rule that empirically dominates a comparator h has population risk at most L(h)+O(√L(h)Gamma+Gamma) with Gamma=(klog n+log(1/δ))/n, without stability; this transfers the comparison principle of the sharp binary theory [MQZ26] while discarding its Boolean-cube geometry, which does not lift to multiclass labels. The lower bound forces both terms using one class and one distribution at every fixed L^star, by a pair-Assouad scheme calibrated to L^star and a fiber argument on the pseudo-cubes underlying the Natarajan-versus-DS separation of [BCD+22]. Both theorems extend to list learning: against the best r-tuple of hypotheses, the same architecture and the same two engines yield an optimistic rate and a lower bound of the same shape, forcing the fluctuation term that [Pab26] expected to be necessary against list comparators, and removing the factor r from the known realizable list lower bound.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.

Builds on

13 of 33 references.

References · 13

  1. 2022A Characterization of Multiclass Learnabilitycited by 67
  2. 2014Optimal Learners for Multiclass Problemscited by 65
  3. 2021A Theory of PAC Learnability of Partial Concept Classescited by 60
  4. 2023Optimal PAC Bounds Without Uniform Convergencecited by 33
  5. 2020Stable Sample Compression Schemes: New Applications and an Optimal SVM Margin Boundcited by 32
  6. 2022A Characterization of List Learnabilitycited by 22
  7. 2023Regularization and Optimal Multiclass Learningcited by 15
  8. 2023Multiclass Boosting: Simple and Intuitive Weak Learning Criteriacited by 11
  9. 2024Revisiting Agnostic PAC Learningcited by 11
  10. 2026The Optimal Sample Complexity of Multiclass and List Learningcited by 11
  11. 2025Sample Complexity of Agnostic Multiclass Classification: Natarajan Dimension Strikes Backcited by 9
  12. 2025On Agnostic PAC Learning in the Small Error Regimecited by 5
1 more
  1. 2015Nearly optimal classification for semimetricscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.