mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sample Complexity of Agnostic Multiclass Classification: Natarajan Dimension Strikes Back

arXiv 2511.12659 ↗First posted 16 Nov 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The fundamental theorem of statistical learning states that binary PAC learning is governed by a single parameter -- the Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension -- which determines both learnability and sample complexity. Extending this to multiclass classification has long been challenging, since Natarajan's work in the late 80s proposing the Natarajan dimension (Nat) as a natural analogue of VC. Daniely and Shalev-Shwartz (2014) introduced the DS dimension, later shown by Brukhim et al. (2022) to characterize multiclass learnability. Brukhim et al. also showed that Nat and DS can diverge arbitrarily, suggesting that multiclass learning is governed by DS rather than Nat. We show that agnostic multiclass PAC sample complexity is in fact governed by two distinct dimensions. Specifically, we prove nearly tight agnostic sample complexity bounds that, up to log factors, take the form fracDS1.5ε + fracNatε2 where ε is the excess risk. This bound is tight up to a √DS factor in the first term, nearly matching known Nat/ε2 and DS/ε lower bounds. The first term reflects the DS-controlled regime, while the second shows that the Natarajan dimension still dictates asymptotic behavior for small ε. Thus, unlike binary or online classification -- where a single dimension (VC or Littlestone) controls both phenomena -- multiclass learning inherently involves two structural parameters. Our technical approach departs from traditional agnostic learning methods based on uniform convergence or reductions to realizable cases. A key ingredient is a novel online procedure based on a self-adaptive multiplicative-weights algorithm performing a label-space reduction, which may be of independent interest.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2025.

Builds on

16 of 42 references.

References · 16

  1. 2018Private PAC learning implies finite Littlestone dimensioncited by 74
  2. 2022A Characterization of Multiclass Learnabilitycited by 67
  3. 2014Optimal Learners for Multiclass Problemscited by 65
  4. 2020An Equivalence Between Private Classification and Online Predictioncited by 64
  5. 2014Minimax Analysis of Active Learningcited by 61
  6. 2021A Theory of PAC Learnability of Partial Concept Classescited by 60
  7. 2016Generalization of ERM in Stochastic Convex Optimization: The Dimension Strikes Backcited by 37
  8. 2023Optimal PAC Bounds Without Uniform Convergencecited by 33
  9. 2021Realizable Learning is All You Needcited by 25
  10. 2023Optimal Learners for Realizable Regression: PAC Learning and Online Learningcited by 23
  11. 2022A Characterization of List Learnabilitycited by 22
  12. 2023The Sample Complexity Of ERMs In Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 8
4 more
  1. 2014Inapproximability of Truthful Mechanisms via Generalizations of the VC Dimensioncited by 6
  2. 2024Fast Rates for Bandit PAC Multiclass Classificationcited by 6
  3. 2023A Unified Characterization of Private Learnability via Graph Theorycited by 5
  4. 2025Private Realizable-to-Agnostic Transformation with Near-Optimal Sample Complexitycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.

9 papers.