Tight Generalization Bounds for Noiseless Inverse Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Inverse optimization (IO) seeks to infer the parameters of a decision-maker's objective from observed context--action data. We study noiseless IO, where demonstrations are generated by a ground-truth objective. We provide a high-probability O(fracdT) generalization bound for the induced action set, where d is the number of unknown parameters and T is the size of the training dataset. We strengthen these guarantees under additional conditions that ensure uniqueness of the chosen action, bringing our IO guarantees in line with best-arm identification results in the bandit literature. We further show that the O(fracdT) rate is tight over all consistent estimators considered here, and extend the result to both instantaneous and cumulative regret. Notably, the resulting regret lower bound matches the corresponding upper bounds in the adversarial setting, indicating that the stochastic IO setting is effectively adversarial for the class of estimators studied here. Finally, we propose a parameter-free algorithm with lower per-iteration complexity than generic solvers. Experiments validate the predicted rates and illustrate the tightness of our bounds.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2026.
Builds on
19 of 30 references.
References · 19
- 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
- 2016CVXPY: A Python-Embedded Modeling Language for Convex Optimizationcited by 633
- 2017Smart "Predict, then Optimize"cited by 332
- 2017Mostly Exploration-Free Algorithms for Contextual Banditscited by 85
- 2022A Characterization of Multiclass Learnabilitycited by 66
- 2019Generalization Bounds in the Predict-then-Optimize Frameworkcited by 54
- 2021Inverse Optimization: Theory and Applicationscited by 48
- 2015Inverse Optimization with Noisy Datacited by 34
- 2015Data-driven Inverse Optimization with Imperfect Informationcited by 33
- 2013Data-Driven Estimation in Equilibrium Using Inverse Optimizationcited by 32
- 2021Contextual Inverse Optimization: Offline and Online Learningcited by 20
- 2021Contextual Recommendations and Low-Regret Cutting-Plane Algorithmscited by 14
7 more
- 2023Learning in Inverse Optimization: Incenter Cost, Augmented Suboptimality Loss, and Algorithmscited by 10
- 2026The Optimal Sample Complexity of Multiclass and List Learningcited by 8
- 2016Inverse Optimization of Convex Risk Functionscited by 7
- 2025Online Inverse Linear Optimization: Efficient Logarithmic-Regret Algorithm, Robustness to Suboptimality, and Lower Boundcited by 7
- 2025Inverse Optimization via Learning Feasible Regionscited by 6
- 2023Inverse Optimization for Routing Problemscited by 5
- 2025Offline Reinforcement Learning via Inverse Optimizationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Multiscale Reward Hedging from Correct Demonstrationscited by 3
- 2026Efficient Online Inverse Optimization with O(d) Regretcited by 2
- 2026Tight Regret Bound for Online Inverse Linear Optimization via Multiscale Matrix Weightscited by 1
- 2026Outperformance Inverse Optimization: Learning Objective Functions that Outperform Agent Decisionscited by 0
- 2026Outperformance Inverse Optimization: Learning Objective Functions that Outperform Agent Decisions7 Oct 2026
- 2026Tight Regret Bound for Online Inverse Linear Optimization via Multiscale Matrix Weights22 Sep 2026
- 2026Efficient Online Inverse Optimization with O(d) Regret11 Sep 2026
- 2026Multiscale Reward Hedging from Correct Demonstrations7 Aug 2026