mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multiclass Learnability Does Not Imply Sample Compression

arXiv 2308.06424 ↗First posted 12 Aug 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A hypothesis class admits a sample compression scheme, if for every sample labeled by a hypothesis from the class, it is possible to retain only a small subsample, using which the labels on the entire sample can be inferred. The size of the compression scheme is an upper bound on the size of the subsample produced. Every learnable binary hypothesis class (which must necessarily have finite VC dimension) admits a sample compression scheme of size only a finite function of its VC dimension, independent of the sample size. For multiclass hypothesis classes, the analog of VC dimension is the DS dimension. We show that the analogous statement pertaining to sample compression is not true for multiclass hypothesis classes: every learnable multiclass hypothesis class, which must necessarily have finite DS dimension, does not admit a sample compression scheme of size only a finite function of its DS dimension.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2023.

Builds on

5 of 26 references.

References · 5

  1. 2022A Characterization of Multiclass Learnabilitycited by 67
  2. 2014Optimal Learners for Multiclass Problemscited by 65
  3. 2021A Theory of PAC Learnability of Partial Concept Classescited by 60
  4. 2015Sample compression schemes for VC classescited by 47
  5. 2016On statistical learning via the lens of compressioncited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.