mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Regularization and Optimal Multiclass Learning

arXiv 2309.13692 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The quintessential learning algorithm of empirical risk minimization (ERM) is known to fail in various settings for which uniform convergence does not characterize learning. It is therefore unsurprising that the practice of machine learning is rife with considerably richer algorithmic techniques for successfully controlling model capacity. Nevertheless, no such technique or principle has broken away from the pack to characterize optimal learning in these more general settings. The purpose of this work is to characterize the role of regularization in perhaps the simplest setting for which ERM fails: multiclass learning with arbitrary label sets. Using one-inclusion graphs (OIGs), we exhibit optimal learning algorithms that dovetail with tried-and-true algorithmic principles: Occam's Razor as embodied by structural risk minimization (SRM), the principle of maximum entropy, and Bayesian reasoning. Most notably, we introduce an optimal learner which relaxes structural risk minimization on two dimensions: it allows the regularization function to be "local" to datapoints, and uses an unsupervised learning stage to learn this regularizer at the outset. We justify these relaxations by showing that they are necessary: removing either dimension fails to yield a near-optimal learner. We also extract from OIGs a combinatorial sequence we term the Hall complexity, which is the first to characterize a problem's transductive error rate exactly. Lastly, we introduce a generalization of OIGs and the transductive learning setting to the agnostic case, where we show that optimal orientations of Hamming graphs -- judged using nodes' outdegrees minus a system of node-dependent credits -- characterize optimal learners exactly. We demonstrate that an agnostic version of the Hall complexity again characterizes error rates exactly, and exhibit an optimal learner using maximum entropy programs.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2023.

Builds on

18 of 45 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,241
  2. 2021Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Losscited by 313
  3. 2021On the Origin of Implicit Regularization in Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 184
  4. 2020Predicting What You Already Know Helps: Provable Self-Supervised Learningcited by 152
  5. 2015Human Pose Estimation with Iterative Error Feedbackcited by 121
  6. 2020A Mathematical Exploration of Why Language Models Help Solve Downstream Taskscited by 72
  7. 2022A Characterization of Multiclass Learnabilitycited by 67
  8. 2014Optimal Learners for Multiclass Problemscited by 65
  9. 2021A Theory of PAC Learnability of Partial Concept Classescited by 60
  10. 2017Geometry of Optimization and Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 39
  11. 2023Optimal PAC Bounds Without Uniform Convergencecited by 33
  12. 2021Realizable Learning is All You Needcited by 25
6 more
  1. 2023Optimal Learners for Realizable Regression: PAC Learning and Online Learningcited by 23
  2. 2023On the Provable Advantage of Unsupervised Pretrainingcited by 22
  3. 2021Optimistic Rates: A Unifying Theory for Interpolation Learning and Regularization in Linear Regressioncited by 17
  4. 2022Multiclass Learnability Beyond the PAC Framework: Universal Rates and Partial Concept Classescited by 14
  5. 2022The One-Inclusion Graph Algorithm is not Always Optimalcited by 11
  6. 2013Entropy, Optimization and Countingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 9.

15 papers.

Sort: