mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Ramsey Theorems for Trees and a General 'Private Learning Implies Online Learning' Theorem

arXiv 2407.07765 ↗First posted 10 Jul 2024cs.LG cs.CR cs.DScited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work continues to investigate the link between differentially private (DP) and online learning. Alon, Livni, Malliaris, and Moran (2019) showed that for binary concept classes, DP learnability of a given class implies that it has a finite Littlestone dimension (equivalently, that it is online learnable). Their proof relies on a model-theoretic result by Hodges (1997), which demonstrates that any binary concept class with a large Littlestone dimension contains a large subclass of thresholds. In a follow-up work, Jung, Kim, and Tewari (2020) extended this proof to multiclass PAC learning with a bounded number of labels. Unfortunately, Hodges's result does not apply in other natural settings such as multiclass PAC learning with an unbounded label space, and PAC learning of partial concept classes. This naturally raises the question of whether DP learnability continues to imply online learnability in more general scenarios: indeed, Alon, Hanneke, Holzman, and Moran (2021) explicitly leave it as an open question in the context of partial concept classes, and the same question is open in the general multiclass setting. In this work, we give a positive answer to these questions showing that for general classification tasks, DP learnability implies online learnability. Our proof reasons directly about Littlestone trees, without relying on thresholds. We achieve this by establishing several Ramsey-type theorems for trees, which might be of independent interest.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2024.

Builds on

16 of 60 references.

References · 16

  1. 2018Private PAC learning implies finite Littlestone dimensioncited by 74
  2. 2022A Characterization of Multiclass Learnabilitycited by 67
  3. 2020An Equivalence Between Private Classification and Online Predictioncited by 64
  4. 2015Differentially Private Release and Learning of Threshold Functionscited by 60
  5. 2021A Theory of PAC Learnability of Partial Concept Classescited by 60
  6. 2023Optimal PAC Bounds Without Uniform Convergencecited by 33
  7. 2014Sample Complexity Bounds on Differentially Private Learning via Communication Complexitycited by 31
  8. 2019Privately Learning Thresholds: Closing the Exponential Gapcited by 31
  9. 2014Characterizing the Sample Complexity of Private Learnerscited by 19
  10. 2022Multiclass Learnability Beyond the PAC Framework: Universal Rates and Partial Concept Classescited by 14
  11. 2023A Trichotomy for Transductive Online Learningcited by 14
  12. 2020On the Equivalence between Online and Private Learnability beyond Binary Classificationcited by 12
4 more
  1. 2023Multiclass Learnability Does Not Imply Sample Compressioncited by 6
  2. 2023Online Learning and Disambiguations of Partial Concept Classescited by 5
  3. 2023A Unified Characterization of Private Learnability via Graph Theorycited by 5
  4. 2021Multiclass versus Binary Differentially Private PAC Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

6 papers.