mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PAC Learning with Bandit Feedback: Sharp Sample Complexity in the Realizable Setting

arXiv 2605.25678 ↗First posted 25 May 2026stat.ML cs.DS cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the problem of multiclass PAC learning with bandit feedback in the realizable setting. In this framework, there is an unknown data distribution over an instance space X and a label space Y, as in classical multiclass PAC learning, but the learner does not observe the labels of the i.i.d. training examples. Instead, in each round, it receives an unlabeled instance, predicts its label, and receives bandit feedback indicating only whether the prediction is correct. Despite this restriction, the goal remains the same as in classical PAC learning. We provide a general characterization of the optimal sample complexity of this problem, sharp for every non-trivial concept class, up to logarithmic factors. Our characterization is based on a new combinatorial dimension, termed the bandit DS dimension, defined via generalized combinatorial structures we call pseudo-boxes. These extend the pseudo-cubes underlying the DS dimension by allowing a different number of neighbors in each coordinate. In contrast to the DS dimension, which governs the full-information setting by counting the number of coordinates in the pseudo-cube, the bandit DS dimension aggregates the number of neighbors across coordinates, leading to a characterization in which the sample complexity scales with the total number of neighbors. We also propose a general learning algorithm achieving the upper bound, based on an algorithmic principle called ListCascade, which connects bandit learning to list learning and may be of independent interest.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.

Builds on

18 of 44 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 481
  2. 2014Taming the Monster: A Fast and Simple Algorithm for Contextual Banditscited by 201
  3. 2016Learning from Untrusted Datacited by 90
  4. 2022A Characterization of Multiclass Learnabilitycited by 67
  5. 2014Optimal Learners for Multiclass Problemscited by 65
  6. 2023Optimal PAC Bounds Without Uniform Convergencecited by 33
  7. 2022A Characterization of List Learnabilitycited by 22
  8. 2023List Online Classificationcited by 16
  9. 2023Multiclass Boosting: Simple and Intuitive Weak Learning Criteriacited by 11
  10. 2024List Sample Compression and Uniform Convergencecited by 10
  11. 2025A Characterization of List Language Identification in the Limitcited by 9
  12. 2025Sample Complexity of Agnostic Multiclass Classification: Natarajan Dimension Strikes Backcited by 9
6 more
  1. 2024The Real Price of Bandit Information in Multiclass Classificationcited by 7
  2. 2024Fast Rates for Bandit PAC Multiclass Classificationcited by 6
  3. 2024A Characterization of List Regressioncited by 6
  4. 2025From Contextual Combinatorial Semi-Bandits to Bandit List Classification: Improved Sample Complexity with Sparse Rewardscited by 4
  5. 2026An Optimal Sauer Lemma Over k-ary Alphabetscited by 4
  6. 2025Private List Learnability vs. Online List Learnabilitycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.