Group Fairness with Uncertainty in Sensitive Attributes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning a fair predictive model is crucial to mitigate biased decisions against minority groups in high-stakes applications. A common approach to learn such a model involves solving an optimization problem that maximizes the predictive power of the model under an appropriate group fairness constraint. However, in practice, sensitive attributes are often missing or noisy resulting in uncertainty. We demonstrate that solely enforcing fairness constraints on uncertain sensitive attributes can fall significantly short in achieving the level of fairness of models trained without uncertainty. To overcome this limitation, we propose a bootstrap-based algorithm that achieves the target level of fairness despite the uncertainty in sensitive attributes. The algorithm is guided by a Gaussian analysis for the independence notion of fairness where we propose a robust quadratically constrained quadratic problem to ensure a strict fairness guarantee with uncertain sensitive attributes. Our algorithm is applicable to both discrete and continuous sensitive attributes and is effective in real-world classification and regression tasks for various group fairness notions, e.g., independence and separation.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2023.
Builds on
20 of 42 references.
References · 20
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2016CVXPY: A Python-Embedded Modeling Language for Convex Optimizationcited by 633
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
- 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
- 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 363
- 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
- 2021A Clarification of the Nuances in the Fairness Metrics Landscapecited by 98
- 2018Fairness Under Unawareness: Assessing Disparity When Protected Class Is Unobservedcited by 94
- 2019Assessing Algorithmic Fairness with Unobserved Protected Class Using Data Combinationcited by 79
- 2020Robust Optimization for Fairness with Noisy Protected Groupscited by 78
- 2019Equalized odds postprocessing under imperfect group informationcited by 48
8 more
- 2020Fair Learning with Private Demographic Datacited by 46
- 2019Noise-tolerant fair classificationcited by 40
- 2021Learning Fair Classifiers with Partially Annotated Group Labelscited by 40
- 2021Selective Regression Under Fairness Criteriacited by 34
- 2018Proxy Fairnesscited by 29
- 2021Fair Classification with Adversarial Perturbationscited by 23
- 2019On Universal Features for High-Dimensional Learning and Inferencecited by 19
- 2019Learning Autocomplete Systems as a Communication Gamecited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
2 papers.
- 2023Adapting Fairness Interventions to Missing Valuescited by 5
- 2024Fairness Risks for Group-conditionally Missing Demographicscited by 0
- 2024Fairness Risks for Group-conditionally Missing Demographics20 Feb 2024
- 2023Adapting Fairness Interventions to Missing Values30 May 2023