FedPF: Accurate Target Privacy Preserving Federated Learning Balancing Fairness and Utility
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training without data sharing, yet participants face a fundamental challenge, e.g., simultaneously ensuring fairness across demographic groups while protecting sensitive client data. We introduce a differentially private fair FL algorithm (FedPF) that transforms this multi-objective optimization into a zero-sum game where fairness and privacy constraints compete against model utility. Our theoretical analysis reveals an inverse relationship: privacy mechanisms that protect sensitive attributes can reduce the statistical power available for detecting and correcting demographic biases under finite samples in federated settings. We further show that our theoretical bounds are consistent with a non-monotonic fairness-utility relationship, which is empirically validated by experiments where moderate fairness constraints improve generalization before excessive enforcement degrades performance. Compared with mainstream algorithms, even under strict privacy constraints, FedPF still maintains the lowest discrimination level among all tested algorithms while retaining high utility. Experimental validation demonstrates up to 42.9 % discrimination reduction across three datasets while maintaining competitive accuracy, but more importantly, reveals that achieving strong privacy and fairness simultaneously requires carefully balanced tradeoffs rather than optimizing either objective in isolation. Furthermore, hardware-level simulations demonstrate that FedPF maintains a low computational footprint, making it suitable for resource-constrained edge devices. The source code for our proposed algorithm is publicly accessible at https://github.com/szpsunkk/FedPF.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2025.
Builds on
28 of 36 references.
References · 28
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
- 2019Fair Resource Allocation in Federated Learningcited by 389
- 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
- 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
- 2020Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspectivecited by 152
- 2020Robust Optimization for Fairness with Noisy Protected Groupscited by 78
- 2018Differentially Private Fair Learningcited by 76
- 2021Towards Fair Federated Learning with Zero-Shot Data Augmentationcited by 64
16 more
- 2020Neither Private Nor Fair: Impact of Data Imbalance on Utility and Fairness in Differential Privacycited by 61
- 2021Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning: Methods, Challenges and Directionscited by 58
- 2020Differentially Private and Fair Deep Learning: A Lagrangian Dual Approachcited by 53
- 2019Equalized odds postprocessing under imperfect group informationcited by 48
- 2021Robin Hood and Matthew Effects: Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Synthetic Datacited by 48
- 2020Fair Learning with Private Demographic Datacited by 46
- 2019Noise-tolerant fair classificationcited by 40
- 2022Disparate Impact in Differential Privacy from Gradient Misalignmentcited by 31
- 2023A Survey of What to Share in Federated Learning: Perspectives on Model Utility, Privacy Leakage, and Communication Efficiencycited by 21
- 2022Stochastic Differentially Private and Fair Learningcited by 16
- 2023Share Your Representation Only: Guaranteed Improvement of the Privacy-Utility Tradeoff in Federated Learningcited by 13
- 2024Clients Collaborate: Flexible Differentially Private Federated Learning with Guaranteed Improvement of Utility-Privacy Trade-offcited by 6
- 2024FedAA: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective on Adaptive Aggregation for Fair and Robust Federated Learningcited by 5
- 2023Toward the Tradeoffs between Privacy, Fairness and Utility in Federated Learningcited by 4
- 2024PUFFLE: Balancing Privacy, Utility, and Fairness in Federated Learningcited by 4
- 2025Fairness Overfitting in Machine Learning: An Information-Theoretic Perspectivecited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.