mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

When Fairness Meets Privacy: Fair Classification with Semi-Private Sensitive Attributes

arXiv 2207.08336 ↗First posted 18 Jul 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning models have demonstrated promising performance in many areas. However, the concerns that they can be biased against specific demographic groups hinder their adoption in high-stake applications. Thus, it is essential to ensure fairness in machine learning models. Most previous efforts require direct access to sensitive attributes for mitigating bias. Nonetheless, it is often infeasible to obtain large-scale users' sensitive attributes considering users' concerns about privacy in the data collection process. Privacy mechanisms such as local differential privacy (LDP) are widely enforced on sensitive information in the data collection stage due to legal compliance and people's increasing awareness of privacy. Therefore, a critical problem is how to make fair predictions under privacy. We study a novel and practical problem of fair classification in a semi-private setting, where most of the sensitive attributes are private and only a small amount of clean ones are available. To this end, we propose a novel framework FairSP that can achieve Fair prediction under the Semi-Private setting. First, FairSP learns to correct the noise-protected sensitive attributes by exploiting the limited clean sensitive attributes. Then, it jointly models the corrected and clean data in an adversarial way for debiasing and prediction. Theoretical analysis shows that the proposed model can ensure fairness under mild assumptions in the semi-private setting. Extensive experimental results on real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our method for making fair predictions under privacy and maintaining high accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2022.

Builds on

29 of 71 references.

References · 29

  1. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  2. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  3. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  4. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  5. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  6. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  7. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
  8. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
  9. 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
  10. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  11. 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
  12. 2020Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 194
17 more
  1. 2020Say No to the Discrimination: Learning Fair Graph Neural Networks with Limited Sensitive Attribute Informationcited by 168
  2. 2020On the Privacy Risks of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 82
  3. 2020Robust Optimization for Fairness with Noisy Protected Groupscited by 78
  4. 2020When Machine Learning Meets Privacy: A Survey and Outlookcited by 67
  5. 2014Differential Privacy and Machine Learning: a Survey and Reviewcited by 66
  6. 2021Fairness via Representation Neutralizationcited by 63
  7. 2021Socially Responsible AI Algorithms: Issues, Purposes, and Challengescited by 56
  8. 2021Natural Language Understanding with Privacy-Preserving BERTcited by 54
  9. 2020Fair Learning with Private Demographic Datacited by 46
  10. 2019Noise-tolerant fair classificationcited by 40
  11. 2020A Comprehensive Survey on Local Differential Privacy Toward Data Statistics and Analysiscited by 26
  12. 2017Penalizing Unfairness in Binary Classificationcited by 25
  13. 2016Achieving non-discrimination in data releasecited by 23
  14. 2019Awareness in Practice: Tensions in Access to Sensitive Attribute Data for Antidiscriminationcited by 23
  15. 2018Utility-Optimized Local Differential Privacy Mechanisms for Distribution Estimationcited by 11
  16. 2022Survey on Privacy-Preserving Techniques for Data Publishingcited by 3
  17. 2021Privacy Preference Signals: Past, Present and Futurecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

6 papers.