Hyper-parameter Tuning for Fair Classification without Sensitive Attribute Access
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fair machine learning methods seek to train models that balance model performance across demographic subgroups defined over sensitive attributes like race and gender. Although sensitive attributes are typically assumed to be known during training, they may not be available in practice due to privacy and other logistical concerns. Recent work has sought to train fair models without sensitive attributes on training data. However, these methods need extensive hyper-parameter tuning to achieve good results, and hence assume that sensitive attributes are known on validation data. However, this assumption too might not be practical. Here, we propose Antigone, a framework to train fair classifiers without access to sensitive attributes on either training or validation data. Instead, we generate pseudo sensitive attributes on the validation data by training a biased classifier and using the classifier's incorrectly (correctly) labeled examples as proxies for minority (majority) groups. Since fairness metrics like demographic parity, equal opportunity and subgroup accuracy can be estimated to within a proportionality constant even with noisy sensitive attribute information, we show theoretically and empirically that these proxy labels can be used to maximize fairness under average accuracy constraints. Key to our results is a principled approach to select the hyper-parameters of the biased classifier in a completely unsupervised fashion (meaning without access to ground truth sensitive attributes) that minimizes the gap between fairness estimated using noisy versus ground-truth sensitive labels.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2023.
Builds on
33 of 52 references.
References · 33
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
- 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
- 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 379
- 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 363
- 2018Learning Models with Uniform Performance via Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 334
- 2020Environment Inference for Invariant Learningcited by 306
- 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
- 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
21 more
- 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
- 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 221
- 2020No Subclass Left Behind: Fine-Grained Robustness in Coarse-Grained Classification Problemscited by 208
- 2020Large-Scale Methods for Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 179
- 2022Correct-N-Contrast: A Contrastive Approach for Improving Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 171
- 2019Distributionally Robust Language Modelingcited by 142
- 2020Learning from Failure: Training Debiased Classifier from Biased Classifiercited by 133
- 2022Spread Spurious Attribute: Improving Worst-group Accuracy with Spurious Attribute Estimationcited by 88
- 2020Robust Optimization for Fairness with Noisy Protected Groupscited by 78
- 2013Classification with Asymmetric Label Noise: Consistency and Maximal Denoisingcited by 67
- 2022Re-contextualizing Fairness in NLP: The Case of Indiacited by 55
- 2020Fair Learning with Private Demographic Datacited by 46
- 2021Towards Fair Classifiers Without Sensitive Attributes: Exploring Biases in Related Featurescited by 45
- 2019Noise-tolerant fair classificationcited by 40
- 2019Toward a better trade-off between performance and fairness with kernel-based distribution matchingcited by 36
- 2021Evaluating Fairness of Machine Learning Models Under Uncertain and Incomplete Informationcited by 33
- 2020Intra-Processing Methods for Debiasing Neural Networkscited by 27
- 2018Autotune: A Derivative-free Optimization Framework for Hyperparameter Tuningcited by 20
- 2022Weak Proxies are Sufficient and Preferable for Fairness with Missing Sensitive Attributescited by 17
- 2020Understanding bias in facial recognition technologiescited by 15
- 2022Fairness via In-Processing in the Over-parameterized Regime: A Cautionary Talecited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
3 papers.