mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Characterizing and Detecting Hateful Users on Twitter

arXiv 1803.08977 ↗First posted 23 Mar 2018cs.CY cs.SIcited by 55

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most current approaches to characterize and detect hate speech focus on textitcontent posted in Online Social Networks. They face shortcomings to collect and annotate hateful speech due to the incompleteness and noisiness of OSN text and the subjectivity of hate speech. These limitations are often aided with constraints that oversimplify the problem, such as considering only tweets containing hate-related words. In this work we partially address these issues by shifting the focus towards textitusers. We develop and employ a robust methodology to collect and annotate hateful users which does not depend directly on lexicon and where the users are annotated given their entire profile. This results in a sample of Twitter's retweet graph containing 100,386 users, out of which 4,972 were annotated. We also collect the users who were banned in the three months that followed the data collection. We show that hateful users differ from normal ones in terms of their activity patterns, word usage and as well as network structure. We obtain similar results comparing the neighbors of hateful vs. neighbors of normal users and also suspended users vs. active users, increasing the robustness of our analysis. We observe that hateful users are densely connected, and thus formulate the hate speech detection problem as a task of semi-supervised learning over a graph, exploiting the network of connections on Twitter. We find that a node embedding algorithm, which exploits the graph structure, outperforms content-based approaches for the detection of both hateful (95% AUC vs 88% AUC) and suspended users (93% AUC vs 88% AUC). Altogether, we present a user-centric view of hate speech, paving the way for better detection and understanding of this relevant and challenging issue.

Key facts. Cited by 55 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 15; 2022: 9; 2023: 11; 2024: 12; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

55 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Detecting and Understanding Harmful Memes: A Surveycited by 58
  2. 2021A Survey on Multimodal Disinformation Detectioncited by 47
  3. 2023COBRA Frames: Contextual Reasoning about Effects and Harms of Offensive Statementscited by 34
  4. 2023HARE: Explainable Hate Speech Detection with Step-by-Step Reasoningcited by 31
  5. 2021A systematic review of Hate Speech automatic detection using Natural Language Processingcited by 27
  6. 2022Hate Speech Criteria: A Modular Approach to Task-Specific Hate Speech Definitionscited by 18
  7. 2022Multimodal Hate Speech Detection from Bengali Memes and Textscited by 15
  8. 2021You too Brutus! Trapping Hateful Users in Social Media: Challenges, Solutions & Insightscited by 11
  9. 2023Social-LLM: Modeling User Behavior at Scale using Language Models and Social Network Datacited by 11
  10. 2024DetoxLLM: A Framework for Detoxification with Explanationscited by 10
  11. 2023Revisiting Hate Speech Benchmarks: From Data Curation to System Deploymentcited by 7
  12. 2024ToXCL: A Unified Framework for Toxic Speech Detection and Explanationcited by 7
38 more
  1. 2024Hate Speech Detection with Generalizable Target-aware Fairnesscited by 7
  2. 2021Introducing an Abusive Language Classification Framework for Telegram to Investigate the German Hater Communitycited by 6
  3. 2024User-Aware Multilingual Abusive Content Detection in Social Mediacited by 6
  4. 2021Retweet communities reveal the main sources of hate speechcited by 5
  5. 2022Heterogeneous Peer Effects in the Linear Threshold Modelcited by 5
  6. 2023On the rise of fear speech in online social mediacited by 5
  7. 2021Leveraging cross-platform data to improve automated hate speech detectioncited by 4
  8. 2021Modeling Users and Online Communities for Abuse Detection: A Position on Ethics and Explainabilitycited by 4
  9. 2021Personalized Entity Resolution with Dynamic Heterogeneous Knowledge Graph Representationscited by 4
  10. 2021Analysis of Twitter Users' Lifestyle Choices using Joint Embedding Modelcited by 4
  11. 2021Twitter User Representation Using Weakly Supervised Graph Embeddingcited by 4
  12. 2021TweetBLM: A Hate Speech Dataset and Analysis of Black Lives Matter-related Microblogs on Twittercited by 4
  13. 2021Online Hate: Behavioural Dynamics and Relationship with Misinformationcited by 3
  14. 2022Exploring Hate Speech Detection with HateXplain and BERTcited by 2
  15. 2023Leveraging heterogeneous spillover in maximizing contextual bandit rewardscited by 2
  16. 2024Decentralised Moderation for Interoperable Social Networks: A Conversation-based Approach for Pleroma and the Fediversecited by 2
  17. 2024Cascade-based Randomization for Inferring Causal Effects under Diffusion Interferencecited by 2
  18. 2021dictNN: A Dictionary-Enhanced CNN Approach for Classifying Hate Speech on Twittercited by 1
  19. 2021Tackling Racial Bias in Automated Online Hate Detection: Towards Fair and Accurate Classification of Hateful Online Users Using Geometric Deep Learningcited by 1
  20. 2021Automatically Detecting Cyberbullying Comments on Online Game Forumscited by 1
  21. 2022Going Extreme: Comparative Analysis of Hate Speech in Parler and Gabcited by 1
  22. 2022Cross-Platform and Cross-Domain Abusive Language Detection with Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 1
  23. 2023Enriching language models with graph-based context information to better understand textual datacited by 1
  24. 2023Detecting Multidimensional Political Incivility on Social Mediacited by 1
  25. 2023Contagion Effect Estimation Using Proximal Embeddingscited by 1
  26. 2025Hate Speech and Sentiment of YouTube Video Comments From Public and Private Sources Covering the Israel-Palestine Conflictcited by 1
  27. 2025Graphically Speaking: Unmasking Abuse in Social Media with Conversation Insightscited by 1
  28. 2025Learning Peer Influence Probabilities with Linear Contextual Banditscited by 1
  29. 2022Detecting Offensive Language on Social Networks: An End-to-end Detection Method based on Graph Attention Networkscited by 0
  30. 2022LEXpander: applying colexification networks to automated lexicon expansioncited by 0
  31. 2023On the Challenges of Building Datasets for Hate Speech Detectioncited by 0
  32. 2023Analyzing User Characteristics of Hate Speech Spreaders on Social Mediacited by 0
  33. 2024SoMeR: Multi-View User Representation Learning for Social Mediacited by 0
  34. 2024The Unappreciated Role of Intent in Algorithmic Moderation of Social Media Contentcited by 0
  35. 2024Do We Trust What They Say or What They Do? A Multimodal User Embedding Provides Personalized Explanationscited by 0
  36. 2024AggregHate: An Efficient Aggregative Approach for the Detection of Hatemongers on Social Platformscited by 0
  37. 2024What is the social benefit of hate speech detection research? A Systematic Reviewcited by 0
  38. 2024Addressing Key Challenges of Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in the Tabular Domain: A Methodological Framework for Coherence and Consistencycited by 0

50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)