Graphically Speaking: Unmasking Abuse in Social Media with Conversation Insights
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Detecting abusive language in social media conversations poses significant challenges, as identifying abusiveness often depends on the conversational context, characterized by the content and topology of preceding comments. Traditional Abusive Language Detection (ALD) models often overlook this context, which can lead to unreliable performance metrics. Recent Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods that integrate conversational context often depend on limited and simplified representations, and report inconsistent results. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that utilize graph neural networks (GNNs) to model social media conversations as graphs, where nodes represent comments, and edges capture reply structures. We systematically investigate various graph representations and context windows to identify the optimal configuration for ALD. Our GNN model outperform both context-agnostic baselines and linear context-aware methods, achieving significant improvements in F1 scores. These findings demonstrate the critical role of structured conversational context and establish GNNs as a robust framework for advancing context-aware abusive language detection.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2025.
Builds on
25 of 54 references.
References · 25
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
- 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 736
- 2021Dealing with Disagreements: Looking Beyond the Majority Vote in Subjective Annotationscited by 314
- 2018Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behaviorcited by 270
- 2021MultiVerS: Improving scientific claim verification with weak supervision and full-document contextcited by 143
- 2019A Benchmark Dataset for Learning to Intervene in Online Hate Speechcited by 129
- 2020Toxicity Detection: Does Context Really Matter?cited by 93
13 more
- 2021Detecting Hate Speech with GPT-3cited by 56
- 2018Characterizing and Detecting Hateful Users on Twittercited by 55
- 2022Hate Speech and Counter Speech Detection: Conversational Context Does Mattercited by 32
- 2021The Structure of Toxic Conversations on Twittercited by 22
- 2021Abuse is Contextual, What about NLP? The Role of Context in Abusive Language Annotation and Detectioncited by 19
- 2021You too Brutus! Trapping Hateful Users in Social Media: Challenges, Solutions & Insightscited by 11
- 2021Revisiting Contextual Toxicity Detection in Conversationscited by 8
- 2023Predicting Hateful Discussions on Reddit using Graph Transformer Networks and Communal Contextcited by 8
- 2022Predicting Hate Intensity of Twitter Conversation Threadscited by 7
- 2022A Graph-Based Context-Aware Model to Understand Online Conversationscited by 7
- 2021Graph embeddings for Abusive Language Detectioncited by 6
- 2023Multi-Modal Discussion Transformer: Integrating Text, Images and Graph Transformers to Detect Hate Speech on Social Mediacited by 6
- 2019Conversational Networks for Automatic Online Moderationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.