mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Retweet communities reveal the main sources of hate speech

arXiv 2105.14898 ↗First posted 31 May 2021cs.SI cs.CY cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We address a challenging problem of identifying main sources of hate speech on Twitter. On one hand, we carefully annotate a large set of tweets for hate speech, and deploy advanced deep learning to produce high quality hate speech classification models. On the other hand, we create retweet networks, detect communities and monitor their evolution through time. This combined approach is applied to three years of Slovenian Twitter data. We report a number of interesting results. Hate speech is dominated by offensive tweets, related to political and ideological issues. The share of unacceptable tweets is moderately increasing with time, from the initial 20% to 30% by the end of 2020. Unacceptable tweets are retweeted significantly more often than acceptable tweets. About 60% of unacceptable tweets are produced by a single right-wing community of only moderate size. Institutional Twitter accounts and media accounts post significantly less unacceptable tweets than individual accounts. In fact, the main sources of unacceptable tweets are anonymous accounts, and accounts that were suspended or closed during the years 2018-2020.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2021.

Builds on

20 of 59 references.

References · 20

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
  3. 2019Predicting the Type and Target of Offensive Posts in Social Mediacited by 268
  4. 2016Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scalecited by 208
  5. 2019SemEval-2019 Task 6: Identifying and Categorizing Offensive Language in Social Media (OffensEval)cited by 206
  6. 2020SemEval-2020 Task 12: Multilingual Offensive Language Identification in Social Media (OffensEval 2020)cited by 138
  7. 2016Community detection in networks: A user guidecited by 105
  8. 2017Measuring the Reliability of Hate Speech Annotations: The Case of the European Refugee Crisiscited by 95
  9. 2016Time for a change: a tutorial for comparing multiple classifiers through Bayesian analysiscited by 92
  10. 2018Spread of hate speech in online social mediacited by 59
  11. 2018Characterizing and Detecting Hateful Users on Twittercited by 55
  12. 2016Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebookcited by 27
8 more
  1. 2016Multilingual Twitter Sentiment Classification: The Role of Human Annotatorscited by 24
  2. 2019The FRENK Datasets of Socially Unacceptable Discourse in Slovene and Englishcited by 8
  3. 2018How to evaluate sentiment classifiers for Twitter time-ordered data?cited by 5
  4. 2020Sustained Online Amplification of COVID-19 Elites in the United Statescited by 4
  5. 2019The Limited Reach of Fake News on Twitter during 2019 European Electionscited by 3
  6. 2016Cohesion and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament: Roll-Call Votes and Twitter Activitiescited by 1
  7. 2020Clusters of science and health related Twitter users become more isolated during the COVID-19 pandemiccited by 1
  8. 2021Community evolution in retweet networkscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

5 papers.