mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Modeling Users and Online Communities for Abuse Detection: A Position on Ethics and Explainability

arXiv 2103.17191 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2021cs.CL cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Abuse on the Internet is an important societal problem of our time. Millions of Internet users face harassment, racism, personal attacks, and other types of abuse across various platforms. The psychological effects of abuse on individuals can be profound and lasting. Consequently, over the past few years, there has been a substantial research effort towards automated abusive language detection in the field of NLP. In this position paper, we discuss the role that modeling of users and online communities plays in abuse detection. Specifically, we review and analyze the state of the art methods that leverage user or community information to enhance the understanding and detection of abusive language. We then explore the ethical challenges of incorporating user and community information, laying out considerations to guide future research. Finally, we address the topic of explainability in abusive language detection, proposing properties that an explainable method should aim to exhibit. We describe how user and community information can facilitate the realization of these properties and discuss the effective operationalization of explainability in view of the properties.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2021.

Builds on

28 of 72 references.

References · 28

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  6. 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,913
  7. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  8. 2019GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 735
  9. 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
  10. 2019Social Bias Frames: Reasoning about Social and Power Implications of Languagecited by 377
  11. 2018Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behaviorcited by 265
  12. 2016Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scalecited by 208
16 more
  1. 2017Understanding Abuse: A Typology of Abusive Language Detection Subtaskscited by 115
  2. 2019The Hidden Assumptions Behind Counterfactual Explanations and Principal Reasonscited by 115
  3. 2019The Dangers of Post-hoc Interpretability: Unjustified Counterfactual Explanationscited by 97
  4. 2017Measuring the Reliability of Hate Speech Annotations: The Case of the European Refugee Crisiscited by 95
  5. 2017Detecting Online Hate Speech Using Context Aware Modelscited by 72
  6. 2018Characterizing and Detecting Hateful Users on Twittercited by 55
  7. 2019A Just and Comprehensive Strategy for Using NLP to Address Online Abusecited by 49
  8. 2017One-step and Two-step Classification for Abusive Language Detection on Twittercited by 46
  9. 2018Leveraging Intra-User and Inter-User Representation Learning for Automated Hate Speech Detectioncited by 25
  10. 2019Abusive Language Detection with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 19
  11. 2019You Shall Know a User by the Company It Keeps: Dynamic Representations for Social Media Users in NLPcited by 14
  12. 2020Joint Modelling of Emotion and Abusive Language Detectioncited by 13
  13. 2017Improved Abusive Comment Moderation with User Embeddingscited by 9
  14. 2018The Road to Success: Assessing the Fate of Linguistic Innovations in Online Communitiescited by 9
  15. 2019Attending the Emotions to Detect Online Abusive Languagecited by 7
  16. 2021Graph embeddings for Abusive Language Detectioncited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.

4 papers.