Introducing an Abusive Language Classification Framework for Telegram to Investigate the German Hater Community
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Since traditional social media platforms continue to ban actors spreading hate speech or other forms of abusive languages (a process known as deplatforming), these actors migrate to alternative platforms that do not moderate users content. One popular platform relevant for the German hater community is Telegram for which limited research efforts have been made so far. This study aims to develop a broad framework comprising (i) an abusive language classification model for German Telegram messages and (ii) a classification model for the hatefulness of Telegram channels. For the first part, we use existing abusive language datasets containing posts from other platforms to develop our classification models. For the channel classification model, we develop a method that combines channel-specific content information collected from a topic model with a social graph to predict the hatefulness of channels. Furthermore, we complement these two approaches for hate speech detection with insightful results on the evolution of the hater community on Telegram in Germany. We also propose methods for conducting scalable network analyses for social media platforms to the hate speech research community. As an additional output of this study, we provide an annotated abusive language dataset containing 1,149 annotated Telegram messages.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2021.
Builds on
8 of 49 references.
References · 8
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
- 2018Learning Word Vectors for 157 Languagescited by 279
- 2020German's Next Language Modelcited by 144
- 2020Top2Vec: Distributed Representations of Topicscited by 124
- 2017Measuring the Reliability of Hate Speech Annotations: The Case of the European Refugee Crisiscited by 95
- 2018Characterizing and Detecting Hateful Users on Twittercited by 55
- 2020The Pushshift Telegram Datasetcited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022Is Your Toxicity My Toxicity? Exploring the Impact of Rater Identity on Toxicity Annotationcited by 67
- 2024HateDay: Insights from a Global Hate Speech Dataset Representative of a Day on Twittercited by 12
- 2024More than Memes: A Multimodal Topic Modeling Approach to Conspiracy Theories on Telegramcited by 6
- 2025Mapping the Italian Telegram Ecosystem: Communities, Toxicity, and Hate Speechcited by 2
- 2024Characterization of Political Polarized Users Attacked by Language Toxicity on Twittercited by 1
- 2023Toxic comments reduce the activity of volunteer editors on Wikipediacited by 0
- 2025Mapping the Italian Telegram Ecosystem: Communities, Toxicity, and Hate Speech28 Apr 2025
- 2024HateDay: Insights from a Global Hate Speech Dataset Representative of a Day on Twitter23 Nov 2024
- 2024More than Memes: A Multimodal Topic Modeling Approach to Conspiracy Theories on Telegram11 Oct 2024
- 2024Characterization of Political Polarized Users Attacked by Language Toxicity on Twitter17 Jul 2024
- 2023Toxic comments reduce the activity of volunteer editors on Wikipedia26 Apr 2023
- 2022Is Your Toxicity My Toxicity? Exploring the Impact of Rater Identity on Toxicity Annotation1 May 2022