Addressing Key Challenges of Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in the Tabular Domain: A Methodological Framework for Coherence and Consistency
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning models trained on tabular data are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, even in realistic scenarios where attackers only have access to the model's outputs. Since tabular data contains complex interdependencies among features, it presents a unique challenge for adversarial samples which must maintain coherence and respect these interdependencies to remain indistinguishable from benign data. Moreover, existing attack evaluation metrics-such as the success rate, perturbation magnitude, and query count-fail to account for this challenge. To address those gaps, we propose a technique for perturbing dependent features while preserving sample coherence. In addition, we introduce Class-Specific Anomaly Detection (CSAD), an effective novel anomaly detection approach, along with concrete metrics for assessing the quality of tabular adversarial attacks. CSAD evaluates adversarial samples relative to their predicted class distribution, rather than a broad benign distribution. It ensures that subtle adversarial perturbations, which may appear coherent in other classes, are correctly identified as anomalies. We integrate SHAP explainability techniques to detect inconsistencies in model decision-making, extending CSAD for SHAP-based anomaly detection. Our evaluation incorporates both anomaly detection rates with SHAP-based assessments to provide a more comprehensive measure of adversarial sample quality. We evaluate various attack strategies, examining black-box query-based and transferability-based gradient attacks across four target models. Experiments on benchmark tabular datasets reveal key differences in the attacker's risk and effort and attack quality, offering insights into the strengths, limitations, and trade-offs faced by attackers and defenders. Our findings lay the groundwork for future research on adversarial attacks and defense development in the tabular domain.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2024.
Builds on
23 of 62 references.
References · 23
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
- 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 903
- 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 790
- 2018Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Informationcited by 501
- 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 491
- 2019HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based Attackcited by 333
- 2019Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Images, Graphs and Text: A Reviewcited by 237
11 more
- 2018Adversarial Robustness Toolbox v1.0.0cited by 215
- 2018Adversarial Attack and Defense on Graph Data: A Surveycited by 167
- 2020Principles and Practice of Explainable Machine Learningcited by 99
- 2022Deep Isolation Forest for Anomaly Detectioncited by 92
- 2018Characterizing and Detecting Hateful Users on Twittercited by 55
- 2021Adversarial Attacks for Tabular Data: Application to Fraud Detection and Imbalanced Datacited by 45
- 2021On the Effectiveness of Small Input Noise for Defending Against Query-based Black-Box Attackscited by 17
- 2021Back in Black: A Comparative Evaluation of Recent State-Of-The-Art Black-Box Attackscited by 16
- 2019Perceptual Evaluation of Adversarial Attacks for CNN-based Image Classificationcited by 12
- 2022Adversarial attacks and defenses in Speaker Recognition Systems: A surveycited by 6
- 2023Your Attack Is Too DUMB: Formalizing Attacker Scenarios for Adversarial Transferabilitycited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.