mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Leveraging cross-platform data to improve automated hate speech detection

arXiv 2102.04895 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2021cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hate speech is increasingly prevalent online, and its negative outcomes include increased prejudice, extremism, and even offline hate crime. Automatic detection of online hate speech can help us to better understand these impacts. However, while the field has recently progressed through advances in natural language processing, challenges still remain. In particular, most existing approaches for hate speech detection focus on a single social media platform in isolation. This limits both the use of these models and their validity, as the nature of language varies from platform to platform. Here we propose a new cross-platform approach to detect hate speech which leverages multiple datasets and classification models from different platforms and trains a superlearner that can combine existing and novel training data to improve detection and increase model applicability. We demonstrate how this approach outperforms existing models, and achieves good performance when tested on messages from novel social media platforms not included in the original training data.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 98 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2021.

Builds on

26 of 98 references.

References · 26

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  3. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  4. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
  5. 2019Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasetscited by 208
  6. 2019SemEval-2019 Task 6: Identifying and Categorizing Offensive Language in Social Media (OffensEval)cited by 206
  7. 2018Hate Speech Dataset from a White Supremacy Forumcited by 196
  8. 2017Deep Learning for Hate Speech Detection in Tweetscited by 180
  9. 2019A Benchmark Dataset for Learning to Intervene in Online Hate Speechcited by 128
  10. 2017Understanding Abuse: A Typology of Abusive Language Detection Subtaskscited by 115
  11. 2017Deceiving Google's Perspective API Built for Detecting Toxic Commentscited by 99
  12. 2020COVID-Twitter-BERT: A Natural Language Processing Model to Analyse COVID-19 Content on Twittercited by 96
14 more
  1. 2018Spread of hate speech in online social mediacited by 59
  2. 2018All You Need is "Love": Evading Hate-speech Detectioncited by 56
  3. 2018Characterizing and Detecting Hateful Users on Twittercited by 55
  4. 2019A Just and Comprehensive Strategy for Using NLP to Address Online Abusecited by 49
  5. 2019Offensive Language and Hate Speech Detection for Danishcited by 48
  6. 2018On the Origins of Memes by Means of Fringe Web Communitiescited by 45
  7. 2017Simple and Effective Dimensionality Reduction for Word Embeddingscited by 38
  8. 2018Hate Speech Detection: A Solved Problem? The Challenging Case of Long Tail on Twittercited by 36
  9. 2018What is Gab? A Bastion of Free Speech or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber?cited by 24
  10. 2018The Effect of Extremist Violence on Hateful Speech Onlinecited by 17
  11. 2019Transfer Learning for Hate Speech Detection in Social Mediacited by 13
  12. 2018Neural Character-based Composition Models for Abuse Detectioncited by 11
  13. 2020Approximate Manifold Defense Against Multiple Adversarial Perturbationscited by 7
  14. 2016A Biased Review of Biases in Twitter Studies on Political Collective Actioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

4 papers.