Tackling Racial Bias in Automated Online Hate Detection: Towards Fair and Accurate Classification of Hateful Online Users Using Geometric Deep Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Online hate is a growing concern on many social media platforms and other sites. To combat it, technology companies are increasingly identifying and sanctioning `hateful users' rather than simply moderating hateful content. Yet, most research in online hate detection to date has focused on hateful content. This paper examines how fairer and more accurate hateful user detection systems can be developed by incorporating social network information through geometric deep learning. Geometric deep learning dynamically learns information-rich network representations and can generalise to unseen nodes. This is essential for moving beyond manually engineered network features, which lack scalability and produce information-sparse network representations. This paper compares the accuracy of geometric deep learning with other techniques which either exclude network information or incorporate it through manual feature engineering (e.g., node2vec). It also evaluates the fairness of these techniques using the `predictive equality' criteria, comparing the false positive rates on a subset of 136 African-American users with 4836 other users. Geometric deep learning produces the most accurate and fairest classifier, with an AUC score of 90.8% on the entire dataset and a false positive rate of zero among the African-American subset for the best performing model. This highlights the benefits of more effectively incorporating social network features in automated hateful user detection. Such an approach is also easily operationalized for real-world content moderation as it has an efficient and scalable design.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2021.
Builds on
20 of 57 references.
References · 20
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,906
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,913
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
- 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
- 2019Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasetscited by 208
- 2016Demographic Dialectal Variation in Social Media: A Case Study of African-American Englishcited by 194
- 2019A BERT-Based Transfer Learning Approach for Hate Speech Detection in Online Social Mediacited by 95
8 more
- 2018Characterizing and Detecting Hateful Users on Twittercited by 55
- 2020Detecting East Asian Prejudice on Social Mediacited by 40
- 2017Mean Birds: Detecting Aggression and Bullying on Twittercited by 29
- 2018Leveraging Intra-User and Inter-User Representation Learning for Automated Hate Speech Detectioncited by 25
- 2019Demographic Inference and Representative Population Estimates from Multilingual Social Media Datacited by 24
- 2019Abusive Language Detection with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 19
- 2018Detecting weak and strong Islamophobic hate speech on social mediacited by 15
- 2014Online networks and subjective well-beingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.
1 paper.
- 2021Hate Speech Classifiers Learn Human-Like Social Stereotypescited by 12
- 2021Hate Speech Classifiers Learn Human-Like Social Stereotypes28 Oct 2021