mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

You too Brutus! Trapping Hateful Users in Social Media: Challenges, Solutions & Insights

arXiv 2108.00524 ↗First posted 1 Aug 2021cs.SI cs.CL cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hate speech is regarded as one of the crucial issues plaguing the online social media. The current literature on hate speech detection leverages primarily the textual content to find hateful posts and subsequently identify hateful users. However, this methodology disregards the social connections between users. In this paper, we run a detailed exploration of the problem space and investigate an array of models ranging from purely textual to graph based to finally semi-supervised techniques using Graph Neural Networks (GNN) that utilize both textual and graph-based features. We run exhaustive experiments on two datasets -- Gab, which is loosely moderated and Twitter, which is strictly moderated. Overall the AGNN model achieves 0.791 macro F1-score on the Gab dataset and 0.780 macro F1-score on the Twitter dataset using only 5% of the labeled instances, considerably outperforming all the other models including the fully supervised ones. We perform detailed error analysis on the best performing text and graph based models and observe that hateful users have unique network neighborhood signatures and the AGNN model benefits by paying attention to these signatures. This property, as we observe, also allows the model to generalize well across platforms in a zero-shot setting. Lastly, we utilize the best performing GNN model to analyze the evolution of hateful users and their targets over time in Gab.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2021.

Builds on

26 of 49 references.

References · 26

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,085
  6. 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,913
  7. 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,543
  8. 2018Weisfeiler and Leman Go Neural: Higher-order Graph Neural Networkscited by 878
  9. 2019GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 735
  10. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
  11. 2014Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documentscited by 677
  12. 2018Learning Word Vectors for 157 Languagescited by 279
14 more
  1. 2018Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behaviorcited by 265
  2. 2018Hate Speech Dataset from a White Supremacy Forumcited by 196
  3. 2019Graph Neural Networks with convolutional ARMA filterscited by 185
  4. 2017Deep Learning for Hate Speech Detection in Tweetscited by 180
  5. 2017A Survey on Network Embeddingcited by 142
  6. 2018Attention-based Graph Neural Network for Semi-supervised Learningcited by 100
  7. 2019DocBERT: BERT for Document Classificationcited by 68
  8. 2018Hate Lingo: A Target-based Linguistic Analysis of Hate Speech in Social Mediacited by 59
  9. 2018Spread of hate speech in online social mediacited by 59
  10. 2018Characterizing and Detecting Hateful Users on Twittercited by 55
  11. 2018Leveraging Intra-User and Inter-User Representation Learning for Automated Hate Speech Detectioncited by 25
  12. 2018What is Gab? A Bastion of Free Speech or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber?cited by 24
  13. 2017A Web of Hate: Tackling Hateful Speech in Online Social Spacescited by 15
  14. 2019Hate begets Hate: A Temporal Study of Hate Speechcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 5; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

11 papers.