mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Do We Trust What They Say or What They Do? A Multimodal User Embedding Provides Personalized Explanations

arXiv 2409.02965 ↗First posted 4 Sep 2024cs.SI cs.IR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the rapid development of social media, the importance of analyzing social network user data has also been put on the agenda. User representation learning in social media is a critical area of research, based on which we can conduct personalized content delivery, or detect malicious actors. Being more complicated than many other types of data, social network user data has inherent multimodal nature. Various multimodal approaches have been proposed to harness both text (i.e. post content) and relation (i.e. inter-user interaction) information to learn user embeddings of higher quality. The advent of Graph Neural Network models enables more end-to-end integration of user text embeddings and user interaction graphs in social networks. However, most of those approaches do not adequately elucidate which aspects of the data - text or graph structure information - are more helpful for predicting each specific user under a particular task, putting some burden on personalized downstream analysis and untrustworthy information filtering. We propose a simple yet effective framework called Contribution-Aware Multimodal User Embedding (CAMUE) for social networks. We have demonstrated with empirical evidence, that our approach can provide personalized explainable predictions, automatically mitigating the impact of unreliable information. We also conducted case studies to show how reasonable our results are. We observe that for most users, graph structure information is more trustworthy than text information, but there are some reasonable cases where text helps more. Our work paves the way for more explainable, reliable, and effective social media user embedding which allows for better personalized content delivery.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2024.

Builds on

37 of 55 references.

References · 37

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  5. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  6. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  7. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  8. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  9. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
  10. 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,684
  11. 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
  12. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 734
25 more
  1. 2019Graph Neural Networks for Social Recommendationcited by 711
  2. 2018Graph Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 345
  3. 2020Algorithmic Recourse: from Counterfactual Explanations to Interventionscited by 250
  4. 2018Tensor2Tensor for Neural Machine Translationcited by 85
  5. 2021User Preference-aware Fake News Detectioncited by 76
  6. 2017Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterizationcited by 64
  7. 2018Characterizing and Detecting Hateful Users on Twittercited by 55
  8. 2021TwiBot-20: A Comprehensive Twitter Bot Detection Benchmarkcited by 51
  9. 2021A Review on Explainability in Multimodal Deep Neural Netscited by 46
  10. 2020TIMME: Twitter Ideology-detection via Multi-task Multi-relational Embeddingcited by 39
  11. 2020Point and Ask: Incorporating Pointing into Visual Question Answeringcited by 39
  12. 2018Deep Neural Networks for Bot Detectioncited by 37
  13. 2018Generating Counterfactual Explanations with Natural Languagecited by 37
  14. 2017Attributed Social Network Embeddingcited by 34
  15. 2020Semantics of the Black-Box: Can knowledge graphs help make deep learning systems more interpretable and explainable?cited by 31
  16. 2019RTbust: Exploiting Temporal Patterns for Botnet Detection on Twittercited by 27
  17. 2019Generation of Multimodal Justification Using Visual Word Constraint Model for Explainable Computer-Aided Diagnosiscited by 18
  18. 2019Social Media-based User Embedding: A Literature Reviewcited by 14
  19. 2018SocialGCN: An Efficient Graph Convolutional Network based Model for Social Recommendationcited by 13
  20. 2022Retweet-BERT: Political Leaning Detection Using Language Features and Information Diffusion on Social Networkscited by 13
  21. 2022BotBuster: Multi-platform Bot Detection Using A Mixture of Expertscited by 11
  22. 2022Detecting Political Biases of Named Entities and Hashtags on Twittercited by 6
  23. 2018Twitter User Geolocation using Deep Multiview Learningcited by 5
  24. 2020The Impact of Explanations on AI Competency Prediction in VQAcited by 5
  25. 2021Twitter User Representation Using Weakly Supervised Graph Embeddingcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.