mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neuro-Symbolic Drive: Rule-Grounded Faithful Reasoning for Driving VLAs

arXiv 2606.23938 ↗First posted 22 Jun 2026cs.AI cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Chain-of-thought reasoning for driving

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Driving VLA models incorporating Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning are attractive because they leverage pretrained VLM representations and expose intermediate decisions in natural language, yet current rationales often lack the step-by-step decision semantics needed to keep the rationale causally connected to the planned motion. We introduce Neuro-Symbolic Drive, a neuro-symbolic driving framework that supervises a driving VLA with rule-grounded reasoning traces extracted directly from classical rule-based planners. Our key observation is that rule-based planners are symbolic AI systems that already function as executable reasoning engines: they reason about active safety constraints, search over candidate maneuvers, and select a final trajectory. We instrument these planners in simulation to capture both the executed trajectory and the internal decision trace at each rule-evaluation step. Each trace is serialized into structured rule-grounded reasoning and paired with the trajectory to fine-tune Qwen3.5-4B as a driving VLA. Because these traces are derived directly from the planner states that determine the action, they ensure reasoning is structurally coupled to motion generation by construction, rather than by post-hoc alignment. On our simulator-generated benchmark, detailed rule-grounded reasoning reduces ADE@3s from 0.47 to 0.26 and miss rate from 8.30% to 6.40% under three-camera perception, and from 0.54 to 0.26 and 10.13% to 5.99% under eight-camera perception. Neuro-Symbolic Drive thus converts neuro-symbolic planning logic into structured supervision. Code base: https://github.com/XiangboGaoBarry/Neural-Symbolic-Drive.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Chain-of-thought reasoning for driving, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 51 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2026.

Builds on

51 of 58 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026AutoDrive-P3: Unified Chain of Perception-Prediction-Planning Thought via Reinforcement Fine-Tuning30 Mar
  2. 2026NaviDriveVLM: Decoupling High-Level Reasoning and Motion Planning for Autonomous Driving9 Mar
  3. 2025Alpamayo-R1: Bridging Reasoning and Action Prediction for Generalizable Autonomous Driving in the Long Tail30 Oct
  4. 2025More Than Meets the Eye? Uncovering the Reasoning-Planning Disconnect in Training Vision-Language Driving Models6 Oct
  5. 2025Drive-R1: Bridging Reasoning and Planning in VLMs for Autonomous Driving with Reinforcement Learning23 Jun
  6. 2025DRAMA-X: A Fine-grained Intent Prediction and Risk Reasoning Benchmark For Driving21 Jun
  7. 2025AutoVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for End-to-End Autonomous Driving with Adaptive Reasoning and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning16 Jun
  8. 2025ORION: A Holistic End-to-End Autonomous Driving Framework by Vision-Language Instructed Action Generation25 Mar
  9. 2024AutoTrust: Benchmarking Trustworthiness in Large Vision Language Models for Autonomous Driving19 Dec
  10. 2024DriveCoT: Integrating Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with End-to-End Driving25 Mar
  11. 2023Reason2Drive: Towards Interpretable and Chain-based Reasoning for Autonomous Driving6 Dec

Other references · 40

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  2. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  3. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  4. 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,081
  5. 2022Planning-oriented Autonomous Drivingcited by 1,068
  6. 2023Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 668
  7. 2023VAD: Vectorized Scene Representation for Efficient Autonomous Drivingcited by 613
  8. 2023DriveLM: Driving with Graph Visual Question Answeringcited by 527
  9. 2021NuPlan: A closed-loop ML-based planning benchmark for autonomous vehiclescited by 485
  10. 2024DriveVLM: The Convergence of Autonomous Driving and Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 482
  11. 2023DriveGPT4: Interpretable End-to-end Autonomous Driving via Large Language Modelcited by 455
  12. 2023LMDrive: Closed-Loop End-to-End Driving with Large Language Modelscited by 301
28 more
  1. 2019Causal Confusion in Imitation Learningcited by 286
  2. 2024Hydra-MDP: End-to-end Multimodal Planning with Multi-target Hydra-Distillationcited by 244
  3. 2021End-to-end Interpretable Neural Motion Plannercited by 240
  4. 2023Parting with Misconceptions about Learning-based Vehicle Motion Planningcited by 238
  5. 2023DriveMLM: Aligning Multi-Modal Large Language Models with Behavioral Planning States for Autonomous Drivingcited by 233
  6. 2023Driving with LLMs: Fusing Object-Level Vector Modality for Explainable Autonomous Drivingcited by 231
  7. 2024EMMA: End-to-End Multimodal Model for Autonomous Drivingcited by 226
  8. 2021MP3: A Unified Model to Map, Perceive, Predict and Plancited by 211
  9. 2023LanguageMPC: Large Language Models as Decision Makers for Autonomous Drivingcited by 188
  10. 2024Senna: Bridging Large Vision-Language Models and End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 156
  11. 2025SimLingo: Vision-Only Closed-Loop Autonomous Driving with Language-Action Alignmentcited by 149
  12. 2023LLM4Drive: A Survey of Large Language Models for Autonomous Drivingcited by 136
  13. 2024Towards learning-based planning:The nuPlan benchmark for real-world autonomous drivingcited by 103
  14. 2024OpenEMMA: Open-Source Multimodal Model for End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 93
  15. 2024RAG-Driver: Generalisable Driving Explanations with Retrieval-Augmented In-Context Learning in Multi-Modal Large Language Modelcited by 91
  16. 2025Distilling Multi-modal Large Language Models for Autonomous Drivingcited by 46
  17. 2023LaMPilot: An Open Benchmark Dataset for Autonomous Driving with Language Model Programscited by 45
  18. 2024Can Vehicle Motion Planning Generalize to Realistic Long-tail Scenarios?cited by 38
  19. 2024DriVLMe: Enhancing LLM-based Autonomous Driving Agents with Embodied and Social Experiencescited by 27
  20. 2021Learning Interpretable End-to-End Vision-Based Motion Planning for Autonomous Driving with Optical Flow Distillationcited by 25
  21. 2025LangCoop: Collaborative Driving with Languagecited by 25
  22. 2024QuAD: Query-based Interpretable Neural Motion Planning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 11
  23. 2026CausalVAD: De-confounding End-to-End Autonomous Driving via Causal Interventioncited by 7
  24. 2025Automated Vehicles Should be Connected with Natural Languagecited by 5
  25. 2026Modular Safety Guardrails Are Necessary for Foundation-Model-Enabled Robots in the Real Worldcited by 5
  26. 2024Visual Program Distillation with Template-Based Augmentationcited by 3
  27. 2026RAD-LAD: Rule and Language Grounded Autonomous Driving in Real-Timecited by 3
  28. 2025SafeCoop: Unravelling Full Stack Safety in Agentic Collaborative Drivingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026A Neuro-Symbolic Framework Combining Inductive and Deductive Reasoning for Autonomous Driving Planning
  2. 2026DriveMA: Rethinking Language Interfaces in Driving VLAs with One-Step Meta-Actions
  3. 2026Grounding What Shapes the Plan: Rethinking Groundedness for Physical Intelligence in Autonomous Driving
  4. 2025VERDI: VLM-Embedded Reasoning for Autonomous Driving
  5. 2026Beyond Textual Chain-of-Thought: A Survey on Action-Grounded Reasoning in Autonomous Driving
  6. 2026Xiaomi OneVL: One-Step Latent Reasoning and Planning with Vision-Language Explanation
  7. 2026Deferred Exposure of Future Trajectories for Verifiable Reasoning in Autonomous Driving VLMs
  8. 2026AnchorVLA: Bridging Discrete Decisions and Continuous Trajectories for Vision-Language-Action Planning