mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Detecting Deepfakes via Hamiltonian Dynamics

arXiv 2605.04405 ↗First posted 6 May 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Driven by the rapid development of generative AI models, deepfake detectors are compelled to undergo periodic recalibration to capture newly developed synthetic artifacts. To break this cycle, we propose a new perspective on deepfake detection: moving from static pattern recognition to dynamical stability analysis. Specifically, our approach is motivated by physics-inspired priors: we hypothesize that natural images, as products of dissipative physical processes, tend to settle near stable, low-energy equilibria. In contrast, generative models optimize for statistical similarity to real images but do not explicitly enforce structural constraints such as geometric smoothness, leaving deepfakes more likely to occupy unstable, high-energy states. To operationalize this, we introduce Hamiltonian Action Anomaly Detection (HAAD), comprising three contributions: i) We model the image latent manifold as a potential energy surface. Under this hypothesis, real images are expected to produce basin-like low-energy responses, whereas fake images are more likely to induce high-potential, high-gradient responses. ii) We employ Hamiltonian-inspired dynamics as a stability probe. By releasing latent states from rest, samples near stable regions remain bounded, while high-gradient samples produce larger trajectory responses. iii) We quantify these dynamic behaviors through two trajectory statistics, ie, Hamiltonian action and energy dissipation. Extensive experiments show that HAAD outperforms evaluated state-of-the-art baselines on challenging cross-dataset transfer benchmarks, supporting a physics-inspired stability prior for digital forensics.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.

Builds on

47 of 61 references.

References · 47

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,181
  4. 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,299
  5. 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,101
  6. 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 847
  7. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 712
  8. 2020Face2Face: Real-time Face Capture and Reenactment of RGB Videoscited by 632
  9. 2019Celeb-DF: A Large-scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensicscited by 575
  10. 2020Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-aware Cluescited by 523
  11. 2023Towards Universal Fake Image Detectors that Generalize Across Generative Modelscited by 490
  12. 2019Face X-ray for More General Face Forgery Detectioncited by 470
35 more
  1. 2019Your Classifier is Secretly an Energy Based Model and You Should Treat it Like Onecited by 405
  2. 2020Lagrangian Neural Networkscited by 398
  3. 2023DIRE for Diffusion-Generated Image Detectioncited by 390
  4. 2022Detecting Deepfakes with Self-Blended Imagescited by 338
  5. 2021PhySG: Inverse Rendering with Spherical Gaussians for Physics-based Material Editing and Relightingcited by 335
  6. 2023GenImage: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Detecting AI-Generated Imagecited by 321
  7. 2021Generalizing Face Forgery Detection with High-frequency Featurescited by 262
  8. 2020DeeperForensics-1.0: A Large-Scale Dataset for Real-World Face Forgery Detectioncited by 254
  9. 2021Spatial-Phase Shallow Learning: Rethinking Face Forgery Detection in Frequency Domaincited by 244
  10. 2019Deep Lagrangian Networks: Using Physics as Model Prior for Deep Learningcited by 212
  11. 2021WildDeepfake: A Challenging Real-World Dataset for Deepfake Detectioncited by 209
  12. 2019Inverse Rendering for Complex Indoor Scenes: Shape, Spatially-Varying Lighting and SVBRDF from a Single Imagecited by 203
  13. 2019Symplectic ODE-Net: Learning Hamiltonian Dynamics with Controlcited by 184
  14. 2023Forgery-aware Adaptive Transformer for Generalizable Synthetic Image Detectioncited by 182
  15. 2023UCF: Uncovering Common Features for Generalizable Deepfake Detectioncited by 180
  16. 2023DeepfakeBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Deepfake Detectioncited by 166
  17. 2024DF40: Toward Next-Generation Deepfake Detectioncited by 129
  18. 2023Transcending Forgery Specificity with Latent Space Augmentation for Generalizable Deepfake Detectioncited by 127
  19. 2022Implicit Identity Leakage: The Stumbling Block to Improving Deepfake Detection Generalizationcited by 123
  20. 2024Orthogonal Subspace Decomposition for Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detectioncited by 105
  21. 2021Face Forensics in the Wildcited by 87
  22. 2022CORE: Consistent Representation Learning for Face Forgery Detectioncited by 74
  23. 2025Dual Data Alignment Makes AI-Generated Image Detector Easier Generalizablecited by 60
  24. 2023Generalizable Synthetic Image Detection via Language-guided Contrastive Learningcited by 49
  25. 2024Can We Leave Deepfake Data Behind in Training Deepfake Detector?cited by 49
  26. 2022Exploring Frequency Adversarial Attacks for Face Forgery Detectioncited by 45
  27. 2023Towards General Visual-Linguistic Face Forgery Detectioncited by 45
  28. 2024Diffusion Facial Forgery Detectioncited by 41
  29. 2024Towards More General Video-based Deepfake Detection through Facial Component Guided Adaptation for Foundation Modelcited by 38
  30. 2024X2-DFD: A framework for eXplainable and eXtendable Deepfake Detectioncited by 35
  31. 2025Celeb-DF++: A Large-scale Challenging Video DeepFake Benchmark for Generalizable Forensicscited by 21
  32. 2023MMNet: Multi-Collaboration and Multi-Supervision Network for Sequential Deepfake Detectioncited by 15
  33. 2025From Specificity to Generality: Revisiting Generalizable Artifacts in Detecting Face Deepfakescited by 14
  34. 2025Fair Deepfake Detectors Can Generalizecited by 7
  35. 2025Learning Real Facial Concepts for Independent Deepfake Detectioncited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.