ProEval: Proactive Failure Discovery and Efficient Performance Estimation for Generative AI Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Evaluating generative AI models is increasingly resource-intensive due to slow inference, expensive raters, and a rapidly growing landscape of models and benchmarks. We propose ProEval, a proactive evaluation framework that leverages transfer learning to efficiently estimate performance and identify failure cases. ProEval employs pre-trained Gaussian Processes (GPs) as surrogates for the performance score function, mapping model inputs to metrics such as the severity of errors or safety violations. By framing performance estimation as Bayesian quadrature (BQ) and failure discovery as superlevel set sampling, we develop uncertainty-aware decision strategies that actively select or synthesize highly informative inputs for testing. Theoretically, we prove that our pre-trained GP-based BQ estimator is unbiased and bounded. Empirically, extensive experiments on reasoning, safety alignment, and classification benchmarks demonstrate that ProEval is significantly more efficient than competitive baselines. It requires 8-65x fewer samples to achieve estimates within 1% of the ground truth, while simultaneously revealing more diverse failure cases under a stricter evaluation budget.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2026.
Builds on
58 of 89 references.
References · 58
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
- 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,420
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,267
38 more
- 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,045
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
- 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 878
- 2023FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performancecited by 853
- 2022BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedurecited by 801
- 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 743
- 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automaticallycited by 672
- 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 404
- 2024AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agentscited by 339
- 2024tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examplescited by 310
- 2023ToxicChat: Unveiling Hidden Challenges of Toxicity Detection in Real-World User-AI Conversationcited by 231
- 2024Rainbow Teaming: Open-Ended Generation of Diverse Adversarial Promptscited by 205
- 2023SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 199
- 2019Addressing Failure Prediction by Learning Model Confidencecited by 186
- 2023DICES Dataset: Diversity in Conversational AI Evaluation for Safetycited by 86
- 2023Anchor Points: Benchmarking Models with Much Fewer Examplescited by 86
- 2021Active Testing: Sample-Efficient Model Evaluationcited by 82
- 2023Efficient Benchmarking of Language Modelscited by 71
- 2017Learning to select data for transfer learning with Bayesian Optimizationcited by 64
- 2021Pre-trained Gaussian Processes for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 63
- 2025Evaluating LLM-based Agents for Multi-Turn Conversations: A Surveycited by 57
- 2023A Comprehensive Analysis of the Effectiveness of Large Language Models as Automatic Dialogue Evaluatorscited by 45
- 2024Auto-Arena: Automating LLM Evaluations with Agent Peer Battles and Committee Discussionscited by 42
- 2025UXAgent: An LLM Agent-Based Usability Testing Framework for Web Designcited by 40
- 2024metabench -- A Sparse Benchmark of Reasoning and Knowledge in Large Language Modelscited by 39
- 2024Active Evaluation Acquisition for Efficient LLM Benchmarkingcited by 35
- 2025Fluid Language Model Benchmarkingcited by 35
- 2023Query-Efficient Black-Box Red Teaming via Bayesian Optimizationcited by 32
- 2014Sampling for Inference in Probabilistic Models with Fast Bayesian Quadraturecited by 31
- 2018Regret bounds for meta Bayesian optimization with an unknown Gaussian process priorcited by 31
- 2025Multi-Agent-as-Judge: Aligning LLM-Agent-Based Automated Evaluation with Multi-Dimensional Human Evaluationcited by 30
- 2018Active model learning and diverse action sampling for task and motion planningcited by 28
- 2018Learning to guide task and motion planning using score-space representationcited by 27
- 2022Active Surrogate Estimators: An Active Learning Approach to Label-Efficient Model Evaluationcited by 26
- 2024Label-Efficient Model Selection for Text Generationcited by 19
- 2024IQA-EVAL: Automatic Evaluation of Human-Model Interactive Question Answeringcited by 19
- 2025Probing for Arithmetic Errors in Language Modelscited by 18
- 2024AcTracer: Active Testing of Large Language Model via Multi-Stage Samplingcited by 17
50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026EarlyEval: Cheaper Agent Evaluation via Early Outcome Prediction
- 2025Can We Detect Failures Without Failure Data? Uncertainty-Aware Runtime Failure Detection for Imitation Learning Policies
- 2026Evaluation as Evolution: Transforming Adversarial Diffusion into Closed-Loop Curricula for Autonomous Vehicles
- 2026Accurate Failure Prediction in Agents Does Not Imply Effective Failure Prevention
- 2026FATE-VLA:Failue-aware test generation for vision-language-action models
- 2025Failure Prediction at Runtime for Generative Robot Policies
- 2026QQJ: Quantifying Qualitative Judgment for Scalable and Human-Aligned Evaluation of Generative AI
- 2026Evaluation Blindness: How Silent Measurement Failures Corrupt AI Systems from Training to Deployment